The practical answer is straightforward: do not use DeepSeek for personal, confidential or business-critical information if you are accessing it through the official app, a web service, or a cloud/API. On June 27, 2025, the Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information notified Apple and Google in Germany that the DeepSeek app constituted “illegal content” .
That does not mean the available sources prove DeepSeek is automatically malware, or that every use compromises a device. The documented concern is mainly about privacy, transfers of data outside the EU, and regulatory compliance under the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR .
Searches for “DeepSeek V4” often focus on the model itself. The German regulatory action, however, concerns the DeepSeek app and service, not a separate security certification for a particular model name . For real-world risk, the decisive issue is where your prompts, files and usage data go.
The central German concern is not the quality of DeepSeek’s answers. It is how user data may be handled.
Berlin’s data protection authority said personal data from German users was being transferred to China and that DeepSeek had not demonstrated an adequate level of protection under GDPR requirements . Other reports describe the same broad issue: alleged unlawful data collection, data transfers to China, and whether DeepSeek meets European privacy standards
.
For users, this does not prove that every prompt will be misused. It does mean that using the app or cloud service with confidential material can create a serious privacy and compliance risk.
Treat DeepSeek via app, browser or cloud API like any external AI tool that has not been formally approved by your organisation. Only enter information that could safely become public.
Keep the following out:
For companies, public agencies, schools and professional services, a personal judgement call is not enough. Before DeepSeek is used for work, privacy, IT security and — where relevant — legal teams should check what data is processed, where it is transferred, what contracts and legal bases apply, and whether internal approval exists.
Those are exactly the questions at the centre of the German debate, particularly around possible GDPR violations and transfers of data to China .
Without that review, DeepSeek should not be used in production for customer data, HR matters, classroom data, public records, client information or internal business documents. For sensitive material, the safer route is an approved system with documented data handling, or a locally controlled deployment — though local use still depends on the concrete technical setup .
If you use DeepSeek privately for harmless experiments, you can reduce the risk, though not remove it completely:
Based on the available sources, DeepSeek in Germany is not proven to be a blanket technical attack on devices. But the privacy position around the official app, web access and cloud/API use is serious enough that personal, confidential and business-critical data should not be entered there.
The key event is the Berlin data protection authority’s action on June 27, 2025, and its criticism of data transfers to China .
If you test DeepSeek only with fictional, anonymised or general prompts, the risk is much lower. Once real people, internal documents, trade secrets or regulated data are involved, a reviewed, approved or locally controlled approach is the safer option .
Studio Global AI
Use this topic as a starting point for a fresh source-backed answer, then compare citations before you share it.
For sensitive data, DeepSeek access via the official app, web service or cloud/API is not advisable in Germany: Berlin’s data protection authority notified Apple and Google on June 27, 2025, that the DeepSeek app was...
For sensitive data, DeepSeek access via the official app, web service or cloud/API is not advisable in Germany: Berlin’s data protection authority notified Apple and Google on June 27, 2025, that the DeepSeek app was... The risk depends heavily on the access route. The official app, web services and cloud/API use raise different questions from a local deployment where data flows, updates and configuration can be controlled [2][4][6][3].
Private users should test only with fictional or anonymised prompts. Companies, public bodies, schools, law firms and medical practices should not use DeepSeek in production without privacy and IT approval.