More than 85% of total CoWoS capacity has already been pre-allocated to just four groups: Nvidia, Broadcom, AMD, and hyperscalers such as AWS, Google, and Meta .
TSMC cannot build enough internal CoWoS lines fast enough. Its solution is to outsource the back-end Wafer-on-Substrate (WoS) portion of CoWoS to outsourced semiconductor assembly and test (OSAT) partners. The critical nuance: OSATs handle only the less complex substrate-assembly and final-test stage, not the full CoWoS process. The front-end chip-on-wafer (CoW) step stays with TSMC .
The OSAT role is being redefined from a downstream afterthought into an integral extension of the foundry value chain — but it is a partial fix. The most complex packaging steps remain TSMC-only.
The most strategic response to the CoWoS crunch comes from MediaTek, which has publicly confirmed it supports both TSMC's CoWoS and Intel's EMIB advanced packaging technologies for its AI ASIC designs, letting customers choose between them . This is the first time a major fabless customer has publicly split its advanced-packaging orders between the two foundries for a single product family — and it is volume procurement, not a technology evaluation .
MediaTek's first custom data-center AI ASIC enters volume production in Q4 2026 and adopts Intel's EMIB-T advanced packaging . The chip was designed for an unnamed US cloud service provider — reported by analysts to be Google, designing a tensor processing unit .
MediaTek is doubling down. Its board has approved $5 billion in financing to secure supply chain capacity and fuel expansion from AI ASIC chips to full-scale systems and platforms . The company expects its data-center AI chip business to generate more than $2 billion in revenue in 2026 and targets a 26% share of the AI ASIC market by 2028 .
MediaTek's first-gen ASIC uses Intel EMIB-T specifically . But the company is simultaneously developing designs for both TSMC CoWoS and Intel EMIB. It is not replacing one with the other — it is giving customers a choice in a supply-constrained world. Intel's EMIB is projected to enable larger package scalability (8–12x reticle size by 2026–2027, versus CoWoS-S's roughly 3.3x), but TrendForce notes that EMIB's limited bridge area and routing density can constrain bandwidth versus CoWoS, making it better suited for ASICs than GPUs .
CoWoS packaging has overtaken leading-edge wafer fabrication as the single biggest constraint on AI chip supply. The numbers tell the story:
| Metric | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 (Forecast) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global CoWoS demand (wafers) | 370,000 | 670,000 | 1,000,000+ |
| TSMC monthly CoWoS capacity (wpm) | ~35,000 | ~75–80,000 | 120,000–140,000 |
| Nvidia's booked share | ~50–55% | ~60% | ~60% |
| Pre-allocated to top 4 customers | — | — | >85% |
| OSAT combined monthly capacity | — | >40,000 | ~80,000 |
| Total global CoWoS-like capacity | — | — | 1.313M wafers annually |
Overall advanced packaging capacity is forecast to grow roughly 80% from 2022 to 2027 . But even that dramatic expansion is not keeping pace with AI demand. JPMorgan forecasts total industry CoWoS consumption reaching 1.15 million wafers in 2026 and 1.55 million in 2027, meaning non-TSMC sources (OSATs) will have to absorb an order-of-magnitude increase in volumes .
Intel's EMIB-T is the primary CoWoS competitor gaining real traction, but analysts caution it remains better suited to ASIC designs than to the highest-bandwidth GPU applications. The real story may be that the advanced packaging bottleneck is not a temporary crunch — it is a structural shift that is forcing the entire AI chip industry to diversify its packaging supply chain for the first time.