答案已發布2 個月前Last edited 2 個月前37 來源

串流版稅計算機 2026：Spotify、Apple Music、Amazon Music 每播一次實際俾幾多？

串流版稅唔係固定每播收費，而係按平台、聽眾地區同訂閱類型而定：Spotify 每播俾 $0.003 $0.005，Apple Music 俾 $0.008 $0.010，而 Amazon Music 喺 2024 年每千次播收 $8.80，係最高嘅。律師行 Manatt Phelps & Phillips 同 Billboard 合作推出嘅 Royalty Calculator，容許 artist 輸入自己合約條款，計算喺 Spotify、Apple Music 同 Amazon Music 嘅實際收入，結果發現 Spotify 留低約 46% 收入，Apple Music 留 25%，而 Amazon Music 就完全唔抽水。

使用 Studio Global AI 搜尋並查核事實瀏覽更多熱門頁面

研究答案

重點

串流版稅唔係固定每播收費，而係按平台、聽眾地區同訂閱類型而定：Spotify 每播俾 $0.003 $0.005，Apple Music 俾 $0.008 $0.010，而 Amazon Music 喺 2024 年每千次播收 $8.80，係最高嘅。
律師行 Manatt Phelps & Phillips 同 Billboard 合作推出嘅 Royalty Calculator，容許 artist 輸入自己合約條款，計算喺 Spotify、Apple Music 同 Amazon Music 嘅實際收入，結果發現 Spotify 留低約 46% 收入，Apple Music 留 25%，而 Amazon Music 就完全唔抽水。
傳統講法話串流平台會拎走 30% 收入，其餘 70% 俾版權持有人，但 Manatt 嘅新數據顯示呢個假設同現實有好大出入，影響 artist 實際袋到嘅錢。

Illustration of streaming royalty calculator dashboard showing Spotify, Apple Music, and Amazon Music payout comparison charts and financial data visualization. — Search & fact-check with cited sources for What major discrepancy exists between longstanding industry assumptions and actual streaming reveThe Manatt Phelps & Phillips royalty calculator, published by Billboard, lets artists calculate personalized streaming payouts based on their specific contract terms.
AI 提示
Create a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: Search & fact-check with cited sources for What major discrepancy exists between longstanding industry assumptions and actual streaming reve. Article summary: Here are the verified findings.. Topic tags: general, general web, user generated, government. Style: premium digital editorial illustration, source-backed research mood, clean composition, high detail, modern web publication hero. Use reference image context only for broad subject, composition, and topical grounding; do not copy the exact image. Avoid: logos, brand marks, copyrighted characters, real person likenesses, fake screenshots, UI text, readable text, watermarks, charts with fake numbers, clickbait thumbnails, icons, and tiny thumbnail layouts. Make it useful as an illustrative visual, not as factual evidence.
openai.com

音樂界成日講緊一個簡單假設：串流平台會拎走 30% 收入，其餘 70% 俾版權持有人。但係新出嘅一個版稅計數機——由律師行 Manatt Phelps & Phillips 開發、經 Billboard 發布——就話現實複雜得多。以下係數據顯示嘅平台抽水比例、每播收費，同 artist 實際賺到嘅錢。

大 discrepancy：傳統 70/30 假設 vs 平台 reality

現有資料確認一個重點：串流版稅通常係基於收入分成或者 streamshare 模式，而唔係固定嘅每次播放收費，而且每個平台嘅 payout 估算好唔同。Manatt 嘅計數機話，Spotify 留低大約 46% 嘅總收入，Apple Music 留 25%，而 Amazon Music 就留 0%——即係將所有訂閱收入直接俾版權持有人。呢啲具體嘅抽水比例數字未經其他來源獨立核實，但佢哋係挑戰傳統 70/30 模式最有力嘅 claim。

Studio Global AI

繼續你的研究

此頁麵包含一個有來源支援的答案，您可以在 Studio Global 內繼續。

使用 Studio Global AI 搜尋並查核事實

人們還問