Stage 2 (Wednesday–Thursday, June 17–18): The Fed's hawkish hold flips everything. The FOMC unanimously held rates at 3.50–3.75%, but new Chair Kevin Warsh delivered a markedly more hawkish message than markets expected . The median 2026 year-end rate projection rose to 3.8% (up from the prior 3.4%), and nearly half of policymakers signaled a potential rate hike later this year . Warsh also removed traditional forward guidance, committing to a purely data-dependent framework . Silver tumbled 2.69% to $68.67 on Wednesday alone , then extended losses to around $66 early Thursday as hawkish Fed pressure persisted .
How this undercut both monetary policy and safe-haven demand simultaneously: The US-Iran deal removed the primary geopolitical risk premium and crushed oil prices, which paradoxically removed the very inflation panic that had been supporting precious metals as an inflation hedge . Then the Fed stepped in to reassert higher rate expectations — raising the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding silver. Both legs of the silver thesis were kicked out at the same time.
Silver's weekly range was exceptionally wide:
| Level | Price | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Cycle low | $61.59 | Lowest since last November |
| Key support | $62.00 | Daily level 2 / range low; repeatedly tested |
| Mid-week bounce | $67–$68 | Recovery into Friday after the low |
| Pre-Fed level | $70.38 | Monday's high after the Iran deal |
| Post-Fed plunge | ~$66 | Thursday morning after hawkish Fed |
| Late-week trade | ~$68.91 | Up 1.5% Thursday, reclaiming the 200 EMA |
From highs near $76.90 in prior weeks, silver completed a sharp leg lower back to the $62 range . The $62 level is the critical "line in the sand" — a weekly range low that bulls must defend to avoid a deeper breakdown toward $50 .
Silver has been notably more volatile than gold. On Monday, silver outperformed gold (+3.45% vs. +2.95%) , but on Wednesday silver fell 2.69% versus a smaller decline in gold . Silver's beta to the macro news cycle remains roughly 1.2–1.5x gold's moves — it rallies harder on good news but also sells off more aggressively when the Fed turns hawkish. Silver also flashed a "sharply weaker" reading in early Thursday trading compared to gold's "lower" reading, per Kitco .
Beyond the week's macro drama, silver faces a significant structural demand challenge:
Bank of America: Forecasts silver to reach $100/oz in Q4 2026, but then retreat to $75 by Q2 2027 as industrial demand declines — calling the rally a "peak-and-decline" pattern .
Finance Magnates technical outlook: Silver's reclaim of the 200 EMA at ~$68.91 drops price back inside the $66–$89 consolidation that has framed the metal since February. The analyst sees ~39% upside potential to $96 if the consolidation holds and the broader uptrend resumes .
Barchart technical view: The $62 level is the key bull-bear line. A clean break below $62 would open a path toward $50 support. Holding $62 with a recovery above $70 would suggest the correction was a shakeout within a larger bullish structure .
CBS News / Winmill (late May): Had forecast a 10–15% decline during June as de-hoarding supply from individuals and institutions increases, which is broadly consistent with the selloff that materialized .
The broader picture: Silver is caught in a tug-of-war between a still-present structural supply deficit (~1.07–1.09 billion oz demand vs. constrained mine supply) and demand-side erosion from solar substitution and a hawkish Fed. The metal's dual identity — half industrial commodity, half monetary metal — means it gets hit from both sides when industrial demand softens and central banks turn hawkish simultaneously.