Мандат UNIFIL закінчується: що чекає на південь Лівану після виходу миротворців?

On August 28, 2025, the UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 2790, extending UNIFIL's mandate for a final time until December 31, 2026. After that date, the nearly 50-year-old peacekeeping mission — currently staffed by roughly 7,500 personnel from nearly 50 countries — will begin a phased drawdown and complete its withdrawal throughout 2027 . The decision, driven by US pressure and aligned with Israeli opposition to the mission, has triggered urgent warnings about civilian protection gaps, especially after a major Israel-Hezbollah war from March to June 2026 .

Resolution 2790: The Final Extension

The Security Council decided that UNIFIL would cease operations on December 31, 2026, and begin a year-long orderly withdrawal . The United States, which holds veto power on the Council, welcomed the vote as bringing "an end to the UNIFIL mandate in a responsible, orderly, and time-bound manner" . The resolution was drafted by France after a compromise was reached with the US, which had initially called for the mission's termination within six months before ultimately supporting a 16-month final mandate . The Council also demanded the full implementation of Resolution 1701 (2006) and reiterated strong support for full respect for the Blue Line .

US Opposition to Extension

The US, backed by Israel, pushed to end the mission. Analysts say Washington adopted the Israeli position that UNIFIL was ineffective and that Israeli military operations in Lebanon should proceed without a monitoring body present . While the Lebanese government and many international members wanted an extension, the US blocked it . Secretary-General António Guterres has since said that peacekeepers will still be needed in Lebanon after the mandate expires, a position likely to face US and Israeli opposition .

Deteriorating Security Situation Since March 2026

A full-scale war between Israel and Hezbollah broke out on March 2, 2026, leading to widespread civilian displacement and possible war crimes . A ceasefire was announced on June 20, 2026 . The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) is currently investigating violations of international humanitarian law committed during the conflict by both parties . UNIFIL itself faced attacks that injured several peacekeepers during this period . Under the laws of war, deliberate attacks against peacekeepers and peacekeeping facilities are unlawful and can amount to war crimes . The Israel-Lebanon framework agreement signed in Washington on June 26, 2026, has also drawn criticism from Human Rights Watch and other organizations for effectively consenting to prolonged and indefinite displacement of tens of thousands of residents of southern Lebanon .

Human Rights Watch Warnings About Civilian Harm

On August 13, 2026, Human Rights Watch urgently called on the Security Council to ensure an international force remains in southern Lebanon to protect civilians and deter abuses by both the Israeli military and Hezbollah . HRW argues UNIFIL is a crucial deterrent and warns that "pulling the plug on UNIFIL without a robust international alternative will leave civilians at grave risk" . The organization urged delaying UNIFIL's departure and extending the mission's mandate beyond December 31, 2026, until the security situation has improved sufficiently to consider further reducing the force . Louis Charbonneau, HRW's UN Director, warned that ending UNIFIL without a robust international force in place "would effectively abandon millions of Lebanese civilians to an uncertain and potentially disastrous fate" .

Proposals for Alternative International Forces

Several proposals have emerged to fill the security vacuum UNIFIL's departure will create:

• Germany proposed an EU-mandated stabilization force: In July 2026, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul proposed an EU-led force to prevent a security vacuum, potentially deploying thousands of troops in joint operations with the Lebanese armed forces . The proposal has been repeated by German officials, who argue the force is needed to allow Israel's army to withdraw from southern Lebanon while also preventing Hezbollah from returning . France, Italy, and the EU's external action service have been leading work on the proposal .

• Lebanese President Joseph Aoun supported an EU-led replacement: President Aoun proposed a European force to replace UNIFIL if the mission cannot remain, stating that if maintaining UNIFIL proves impossible, "an alternative force could be established to replace it" .

• UN Secretary-General's three options: Guterres submitted three scenarios to the Security Council in June 2026 — light, medium, or more substantial presence — with troop numbers ranging from roughly 1,980 to 5,525 uniformed personnel . The first option would establish an unarmed military observer presence of 350 personnel supported by four infantry battalions totaling 3,000 armed troops and a 700-member reserve force, while the most robust option would include broader monitoring and de-escalation capabilities . Another proposal involves the UN Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO) taking over some functions, though UNTSO would be a much smaller force .

• No Security Council consensus yet: As of mid-July 2026, the Council had not begun substantive discussions on a replacement, with diplomats awaiting outcomes of US-brokered Israel-Lebanon talks . The Security Council has yet to reach a decision and could ultimately opt for a course of action different from the three proposed alternatives .