On June 3, 2026, Vietnam's National Competition Commission announced a VNĐ290 million ( $11,000) fine against Xiaomi Vietnam for three violations: not obtaining consumer consent for data use, failing to disclose influ... The fine is part of a wider Vietnamese government crackdown, which has sanctioned 14 businesses...

Create a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: What did Vietnam fine Xiaomi VNĐ290 million (~$11,000) for in May 2026, what three specific violations of the 2023 Law on Protection of Cons. Article summary: On June 3, 2026, Vietnam's National Competition Commission (VCC) announced that it had fined Xiaomi Vietnam Co., Ltd. VNĐ290 million (approximately $11,000–$11,010) for three violations of the 2023 Law on Protection of C. Topic tags: general, general web, user generated. Reference image context from search candidates: Reference image 1: visual subject "**Hanoi (VNA)** – Xiaomi Vietnam Co., Ltd was fined 290 million VND (about 11,000 USD) for three violations of consumer protection regulations, according to the National Competiti" source context "Xiaomi Vietnam fined for violating consumer rights" Reference image 2: visual subject "A view of the business semina
Vietnam's consumer protection regulators have made an example of a global smartphone giant. On June 3, 2026, the National Competition Commission (VCC) publicized a VNĐ290 million (approximately $11,000) fine against Xiaomi Vietnam Co., Ltd. for a trio of violations under the country's 2023 Law on Protection of Consumer Rights. The underlying decision, No. 123/QĐ-XPHC, was signed on May 7, 2026 .
This penalty underscores Vietnam's escalating efforts to rein in technology companies over data privacy, transparent marketing, and fair contractual practices. The case against Xiaomi provides a clear map of the specific business behaviors now drawing fines in the country.
The VCC's decision pinpointed three distinct breaches of the 2023 consumer protection law. Each violation represents a target area for the commission's current enforcement agenda.
Xiaomi was found to have not provided consumers with a clear choice to allow or refuse the use of their personal information for advertising, product promotion, and other commercial activities. This practice violates Point b, Clause 4, Article 18 of the 2023 Law on Protection of Consumer Rights . This breach highlights the law's requirement for explicit, opt-in consumer consent before personal data is used for marketing.
The company failed to publicly disclose or notify consumers in advance that it was sponsoring Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) and influencers to promote its products. According to the decision, this failure to disclose the commercial relationship violates Point h, Clause 1, Article 35 of the 2023 Law . The rule targets covert advertising, ensuring consumers know when product endorsements are paid for.
Xiaomi’s standard consumer contracts included terms that unfairly limited the company's liability and allowed it to unilaterally change terms without reasonable notice to the buyer. These contractual provisions were found to violate Point a, Clause 2, and Point b, Clause 2, Article 27 of the 2023 Law . This part of the ruling addresses power imbalances in standard-form contracts.
The fine against Xiaomi is not an isolated incident but part of a systematic regulatory push in Vietnam. Both the 2023 Law on Protection of Consumer Rights and the amended Advertising Law, which took effect on January 1, 2026, have armed authorities with new tools to target misleading influencer marketing .
The VCC has been actively wielding these new powers. By January 2026, the commission had already fined 14 businesses and 6 individuals a total of over VNĐ3.55 billion for related violations .
A direct precedent for Xiaomi’s influencer disclosure violation exists. On January 14, 2026, the VCC fined Y&B Joint Stock Company, the exclusive distributor of Cocoon Vietnam-branded cosmetics, VNĐ50 million. The company failed to disclose to consumers that it had sponsored influencers to promote its products—the same violation cited for Xiaomi . This prior enforcement action clearly signaled the VCC's intentions.
The new rules require KOLs to verify product information and publicly disclose that their endorsement is a paid sponsorship. Influencers and the companies that hire them now face joint liability if advertising causes harm .
The $11,000 fine in Vietnam is a relatively small sum compared to the legal risks Xiaomi faces in other jurisdictions. In January 2025, the Austrian privacy advocacy group noyb (None of Your Business) filed a series of GDPR complaints against Xiaomi and five other Chinese tech companies in five EU countries. These complaints allege the unlawful transfer of European users’ personal data to China, a country the EU does not recognize as having adequate data protections .
These GDPR complaints, which are still pending, can theoretically result in fines of up to 4% of a company’s global annual turnover. This stands in stark contrast to the more modest administrative fines currently issued under Vietnam's new consumer protection framework. By early 2026, total GDPR fines across the EU had surpassed €7.1 billion, illustrating the immense financial scale of European data-privacy enforcement .
Studio Global AI
Use this topic as a starting point for a fresh source-backed answer, then compare citations before you share it.
On June 3, 2026, Vietnam's National Competition Commission announced a VNĐ290 million ( $11,000) fine against Xiaomi Vietnam for three violations: not obtaining consumer consent for data use, failing to disclose influ...
On June 3, 2026, Vietnam's National Competition Commission announced a VNĐ290 million ( $11,000) fine against Xiaomi Vietnam for three violations: not obtaining consumer consent for data use, failing to disclose influ... The fine is part of a wider Vietnamese government crackdown, which has sanctioned 14 businesses and 6 individuals with a total of over VNĐ3.55 billion for misleading influencer advertising and other consumer rights vi...