The deepest miss was at the operating-profit level. CLSA had already warned that adjusted EBIT would likely fall 41% to around RMB 6.5 billion . When the actual print arrived, it confirmed that the miss was most acute in the EBIT line—exactly the metric that makes valuation models wobble
.
The post-earnings reaction that drew the most attention came from Jefferies. The firm downgraded Xiaomi from Hold to Underperform and cut its price target from HK$26.98 to HK$25.49 . Jefferies gave three specific reasons for the move
:
The HK$25.49 target implied a 14% downside from the stock's previous closing price, and Jefferies was not alone in feeling that the numbers demanded a more bearish stance .
Goldman Sachs had already reduced its Q1 revenue and profit forecasts by roughly 12% before the print, projecting RMB 98 billion in revenue and calling out that "the profit contribution from smart EV and other new businesses is expected to subside" . Post-earnings, the bank noted that gross margins had held up better than some feared, but the overall picture remained strained
.
Across the full analyst consensus, the reset has been methodical and wide-reaching. The average price target slid from HK$40 to HK$30, and several major banks trimmed forecasts or ratings :
Despite the downgrades, the stock still carries a consensus Buy rating from 33 analysts, though the sliding targets suggest conviction is weakening .
The negative results did not come from a single weak spot. They reflected a convergence of external shocks and internal transitions that hit simultaneously :
Sharp increases in DRAM and NAND prices squeezed smartphone margins much harder than management had signaled earlier in the year. The company's own HKEX filing cited this as a primary drag alongside broader commodity inflation . Xiaomi responded by deliberately cutting shipments of low-end models, which helped average selling prices but caused a 19% year-over-year drop in global smartphone shipments, according to IDC data cited by CLSA
.
A broader industry slump magnified the cost problem. Revenue from the Smartphone × AIoT segment fell 14.5% year-over-year, and competitors gained ground in several key markets . Morgan Stanley cut its global smartphone shipment forecast explicitly because of the margin and demand pressures Xiaomi was absorbing
.
Xiaomi delivered roughly 79,000 vehicles in the first quarter . That represents less than 55% of the roughly 145,000-unit quarterly run rate it needed to meet its public target of 550,000 deliveries for the full year
. While the SU7 model racked up more than 63,000 confirmed orders, plant capacity in Beijing remained the bottleneck
. The EV unit generated about $2.8 billion in revenue but continued to weigh on overall profitability because of heavy R&D investment and still-thin margins
.
The official filing cited geopolitical uncertainties, intensifying industry competition, and the withdrawal of Chinese consumer subsidies as additional headwinds that clouded the near-term outlook .
Within hours of the earnings release, Xiaomi moved on multiple fronts to demonstrate that leadership was not standing still :
Xiaomi's Q1 2026 collapse leaves analysts in a genuinely fractured position. The Jefferies downgrade to Underperform captures the camp that sees a stock priced for a growth trajectory that no longer matches the underlying P&L reality—especially when EV valuation pressure is layered onto a legacy business facing its toughest margin environment in years . On the other side, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have kept their Buy-equivalent ratings, arguing that the AI strategy, ecosystem stickiness, and eventual EV scale-up will reward patient capital over a 12-month horizon
.
What nobody is disputing is the near-term pain. With memory chip shortages projected to last into late 2027, smartphone recovery likely to be slow, and the EV unit still burning cash while chasing a stretched delivery target, Xiaomi's next few quarters will test whether its strategic bets can offset the cost storm—or whether more downgrades are still to come .
Comments
0 comments