The stoppage occurred moments after Usyk knocked Verhoeven down late in the round. Although Verhoeven beat the count and was still standing, the referee waved off the fight as Usyk pressed forward.
The finish quickly became the defining storyline.
Reports described the stoppage as highly controversial because Verhoeven appeared able to continue when the referee intervened. Some live scoring even had the fight competitive—or leaning toward Verhoeven—before the dramatic final sequence.
With only one second remaining in the round when the fight was stopped, critics argued that Verhoeven might have survived the round and forced the fight to continue into the championship rounds.
For stretches of the fight, Usyk looked unusually restrained. But as the bout progressed, the undefeated champion began to assert control with his trademark ring intelligence and timing.
Key highlights from Usyk included:
The finish reinforced a familiar theme in Usyk’s career: the ability to adapt mid‑fight and surge late when the stakes are highest.
Despite the loss, Verhoeven delivered a performance that surprised many boxing observers.
The longtime kickboxing champion used his size, physical strength, and forward pressure to trouble Usyk through much of the first ten rounds.
Highlights from Verhoeven’s performance included:
Many observers noted that the fight remained competitive deep into the contest before the stoppage, underscoring how well Verhoeven adapted to boxing at the elite level.
But the wider conversation is already focused on the stoppage. With Verhoeven still upright and the round seconds from ending, the referee’s decision will likely dominate the post‑fight debate.
For Usyk, the win preserves his unbeaten legacy and championship status. For Verhoeven, the performance—despite the controversial ending—proved he could compete with one of boxing’s most accomplished champions.
In a sport built on drama, this fight delivered it in full: elite skill, a late knockdown, and an ending that fans will argue about long after the final bell.
Comments
0 comments