סערת המים במונדיאל 2026: פיפ

The partial reversal: what fans can now bring

After the overnight controversy, FIFA issued a "clarification" on Friday, June 5. Heimo Schirgi, chief operating officer of the 2026 World Cup, said in a social-media video that every spectator would be allowed to carry "one soft, plastic, disposable, factory-sealed water bottle up to 20 ounces (590 milliliters)" into matches in the US and Canada .

Crucially, the concession does not extend to reusable containers. Hard-sided or refillable bottles remain banned under the safety rationale . Because fans are still not allowed to bring empty containers through security, any water fountain or dispenser inside a stadium is effectively off-limits for refilling . The result is a policy that permits one store-bought bottle of water per person while removing the option to refill it for free.

Political and public-health backlash

The rule change drew unusually swift condemnation from elected officials and public-health advocates.

• Host-city politicians pushed back. Toronto city officials said they raised concerns directly with FIFA about the ban . Other politicians—along with fan advocacy groups—called the last-minute policy dangerous and anti-consumer .
• Heat-safety advocates warned of dehydration risk. The World Cup runs in June and July, and multiple venues offer limited or no shade . With a heat wave already reported as the tournament approaches, critics argued that preventing fans from carrying water and from refilling bottles would raise the risk of heat-related illness .
• FIFA insiders had raised the same alarm. According to a report in The Athletic, members of FIFA’s own security and safety teams objected to the water-bottle ban during internal debates, warning it would put fans at risk of heat stress. The same report described "tension for months over the policy inside FIFA" .

Heat, Coca-Cola, and the commercial-interest question

The controversy is not happening in a vacuum. Several conditions amplify the safety concerns and give critics a framework for the backlash.

Summer heat in North America. Matches will take place in cities where June and July temperatures can be extreme. Stadiums vary in how much cover they provide, and some have little shade . Public-health experts argue any policy that discourages hydration during hours-long outdoor events in these conditions is reckless .

Coca-Cola's exclusive pouring rights. As a Tier-1 FIFA Partner, Coca-Cola holds exclusive rights to sell all non-alcoholic beverages inside World Cup stadiums—a relationship that dates back to 1974 and a formal sponsorship to 1978 . That means every water, soda, and sports drink available at concessions comes through Coca-Cola brands, including Dasani water and Powerade .

By blocking reusable bottles, the policy forces fans who want to hydrate beyond the first 590 milliliters they bring to buy drinks from a Coca-Cola-operated stand. Critics argue this structure creates a direct commercial incentive for FIFA's largest sponsor at the expense of fan access to free water . The Athletic cited a source who said the original bottle-ban decision was "highly influenced by commercial considerations" . FIFA has not publicly acknowledged any commercial motive, but the optics of a rule that benefits a near-50-year sponsor while limiting hydration during extreme heat have become a core part of the public criticism .

FIFA’s June 5 announcement calmed some immediate anger, but the underlying ban on reusable bottles remains in place. As a result, the debate over whether fan safety or sponsor sales determine the rules has continued into the opening week of the tournament.