Ethereum’s roughly 72% 90 day gain outpaced Bitcoin’s 42%, but ETH’s market cap was still about 5.1 times smaller in late September 2026. ETH had also fallen farther from its peak, while spot ETF flows shifted across different periods—so the recent price lead does not by itself show a lasting change in investor demand.
Published byEdited with GPT-6 LunaImages generated with GPT Image 2
Research answer

Create a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: Why has Ethereum gained about 72% over the past 90 days versus Bitcoin’s 42%, and does that outperformance make a “flippening” of Bitcoin’s. Article summary: Ethereum’s roughly 72% gain versus Bitcoin’s 42% over 90 days looks more like a strong rebound from a deeper fall than evidence that Ethereum is close to overtaking Bitcoin in market value. A “flippening” is possible in . Topic tags: general, general web. Style: premium digital editorial illustration, source-backed research mood, clean composition, high detail, modern web publication hero. Use reference image context only for broad subject, composition, and topical grounding; do not copy the exact image. Avoid: logos, brand marks, copyrighted characters, real person likenesses, fake screenshots, UI text, readable text, watermarks, charts with fake numbers, click
Ethereum’s roughly 72% gain over 90 days, compared with Bitcoin’s 42%, is a striking run—but it is not the same as catching up in market value. At the late-September 2026 snapshot, Ethereum’s market cap was about $331 billion versus Bitcoin’s nearly $1.7 trillion, leaving ETH around 5.1 times smaller.4
16 The rally is better understood as a strong rebound after a deeper decline than as evidence that a “flippening” is close.
The comparison depends on the starting point. Reports put Ethereum about 69% below its peak before the rebound, compared with roughly 54% for Bitcoin.5
30 A larger percentage gain from a lower base can narrow losses without erasing them: ETH’s recent outperformance does not, by itself, establish that its longer-term position has overtaken Bitcoin’s.
A flippening means Ethereum’s total market value surpasses Bitcoin’s. Based on the reported late-September figures, ETH would need to grow about 5.1 times relative to BTC for their market caps to match, assuming the other asset’s value and relative supplies remained broadly unchanged.4
16
The ETH/BTC exchange rate offers another way to track relative performance. One late-September report put it near 0.0315.20 At that level, reaching roughly 0.16 would correspond to closing the market-cap gap if the relative supply relationship stayed broadly stable. That is a much larger move than a single strong quarter—and a calculation, not a forecast.
Spot ETF flows provide evidence of investor activity, but the picture changes with the measurement window. Bitcoin ETFs drew about $3.8 billion over three weeks from August 18 to September 5, while a report said Ethereum ETF inflows had fallen sharply over a shorter weekly period.1 Later September reporting showed positive inflows for both assets; one monthly tally put Ethereum ETFs at about $445 million and Bitcoin ETFs at about $467 million.
3 These snapshots do not establish a durable shift in preference toward ETH.
ETF flows also capture only activity through those products. They can help explain investor interest, but they are not proof that Ethereum’s relative market value will keep rising.
Ethereum offers staking rewards, unlike simply holding an asset that does not pay a staking reward. A source published in July reported about 32% of ETH supply staked and an annual percentage rate around 2.6%; a separate September report also put the staked share near 32%.18
27 That feature may matter to some holders, but the reported figures alone do not show that staking is driving the rally or will close the market-cap gap.
The useful signal is sustained relative strength: ETH would need to keep gaining against BTC, not just post a larger dollar-price rise over one period. Continued demand for ETH through investment products and the Ethereum ecosystem would also matter, but the evidence here is mixed. With Bitcoin still far ahead in market value, three months of outperformance is not enough to call a flippening likely.1
3
4
16
In short, Ethereum’s rally is notable, but the starting-point effect and the size of the remaining market-cap gap matter more than the headline return alone.
Studio Global AI
This page includes a source-backed answer you can continue inside Studio Global.
Ethereum’s roughly 72% 90 day gain outpaced Bitcoin’s 42%, but ETH’s market cap was still about 5.1 times smaller in late September 2026.
Ethereum’s roughly 72% 90 day gain outpaced Bitcoin’s 42%, but ETH’s market cap was still about 5.1 times smaller in late September 2026. ETH had also fallen farther from its peak, while spot ETF flows shifted across different periods—so the recent price lead does not by itself show a lasting change in investor demand.
Staking gives ETH a yield related feature Bitcoin does not share, but sustained relative gains and durable demand would be needed to substantially narrow the market cap gap.