Matthew Sigel, VanEck’s head of digital-asset research, has described Bitcoin as being in the early stages of a bull market. The thesis is that a decline from the October 2025 peak could be a correction rather than a break in Bitcoin’s longer-term adoption story. But VanEck’s own research through the summer of 2026 was mixed: it identified signs of a possible bottom while also documenting weak market conditions.
1
6
12
13
What are VanEck’s Bitcoin price targets?
The medium-term scenario is about $500,000 per bitcoin. Its benchmark is Bitcoin reaching roughly half of gold’s market capitalization. The figure describes a potential valuation under that assumption; it is not a dated forecast.
1
6
VanEck’s 2050 base case is $2.9 million, often rounded to $3 million in news reports. The firm’s model assumes a 15% annualized growth rate, Bitcoin settling 5–10% of global trade, and central banks holding 2.5% of their assets in Bitcoin. Those adoption assumptions are central to the scenario, not outcomes the model guarantees.
15
Why the bull case points to gold and ETFs
The investment case draws on Bitcoin’s role as “digital gold.” Reports on Sigel’s view say Bitcoin’s correlation with gold has reached a multi-year high. That may support the comparison, but correlation alone does not show that Bitcoin will capture half of gold’s market value.
1
6
Spot exchange-traded products are another proposed source of demand, and reports cite institutional inflows as support for the bullish view. The picture is not uniformly positive: VanEck’s June 2026 research reported about $5 billion in US spot exchange-traded product outflows. The flow data therefore complicates a simple claim that ETF buying is consistently supporting prices.
1
23
What VanEck’s 2026 research says about the downturn
VanEck’s July review described Bitcoin near $63,700 as consolidating, not recovering, and flagged miner economics as weak.
13
By August, the firm said the decline through spring appeared to have steadied and identified a possible low near $58,500 on June 30. That is evidence for a possible turn, not confirmation of a new bull market. The same month, VanEck reported that long-term holders had sold 356,000 BTC over 30 days—another reason to be cautious about calling a bottom.
12
24
In September, VanEck focused on miners’ access to electricity as AI data centers compete for power, describing power—not chips—as the binding constraint. That may give some miners’ energy infrastructure and power arrangements added business value. It is a separate investment argument, however, and does not by itself prove a higher Bitcoin price.
10
Miners, AI power demand and Bitcoin’s outlook
The AI connection is mainly about miners’ infrastructure: companies with access to electricity or long-term power arrangements may have options beyond mining Bitcoin. Sigel has also described miners’ power agreements as potentially valuable as AI data-center demand grows.
5
10
That does not mean miners’ businesses are uniformly healthy. VanEck’s July report said miner economics were near multi-year lows, and its June review noted that some miners were selling Bitcoin to fund operations. The AI opportunity and pressure on mining economics can coexist.
13
23
Quantum computing remains a long-term risk
Sigel has characterized quantum computing as a risk to monitor, but not one he considers close enough to justify selling Bitcoin now. That is his assessment of the current risk, not proof that the technology poses no future threat. CNBC also reported that the Bitcoin community is discussing a framework for quantum-resistant upgrades.
3
11
The bottom line
Sigel’s bull-market view links Bitcoin’s possible recovery to its appeal as an alternative to gold and to wider adoption for payments and reserves. The $500,000 medium-term scenario depends on Bitcoin reaching half of gold’s market value; the $2.9 million 2050 base case depends on substantial adoption and a 15% annualized growth assumption.
1
15
VanEck’s summer research offers reasons for both optimism and caution: a possible bottom, but also weak miner economics, spot-product outflows and continued selling by long-term holders. The targets are best understood as conditional scenarios—not price promises or evidence that a bull market is confirmed.
12
13
23
24