Tesla closed at $382.70 on October 9, 2026, up 2.05%. The move came as investors considered stronger September shipments from Tesla’s Shanghai factory, bullish expectations for its AI businesses and renewed attention to Terafab. Those developments offered reasons for optimism, but they did not resolve questions about Chinese retail demand or whether Tesla can execute a large-scale chipmaking project.
28
38
A market report also listed SpaceX shares under the ticker SPCX as up 1.25%. The supplied reporting does not establish that Terafab caused that move—or clearly connect it to the same trading session—so the two gains should not be treated as proof of a shared catalyst.
10
Terafab: more control, more execution risk
The Terafab story shifted over several days. A report attributed to journalist Tim Culpan described possible TSMC involvement in operating the planned Texas complex. Musk later acknowledged discussions with TSMC, but said they were only discussions. On October 7, he said Tesla and SpaceX would build and run the facility themselves, while leaving open the possibility that TSMC could sublease part of the site.
5
6
7
That stance supports a vertical-integration case: Tesla and SpaceX would aim to control the facility rather than rely on TSMC to operate it. But control is not the same as proven manufacturing capability. Building and running a chip fab would bring substantial execution demands, and the project’s reported cost estimates underscore the scale: one account put the first phase at $16.8 billion and total spending across phases as high as $119 billion. These are reported projections, not evidence that the facility is complete or that the spending is assured.
3
8
Intel’s continued involvement offered another point of interest. Reporting said CEO Lip-Bu Tan confirmed Intel would remain involved, but the available accounts do not clearly establish the company’s precise role.
1
11
China shipments gave investors a mixed signal
Tesla’s Shanghai-built Model 3 and Model Y shipments, including vehicles for export, reached 95,366 in September, up 5% year over year. Another report said third-quarter China-made vehicle sales grew 13.7% year over year.
28
38
But shipments do not tell the whole demand story. The same September data showed exports up 58% while Chinese retail sales were down about 9.4%. Tesla’s global third-quarter deliveries were also reported to be about 2.1% lower year over year. The figures could support a more positive view of factory output while leaving questions about domestic demand and overall growth.
28
37
Analyst optimism meets an earnings test
Bullish analyst views reinforced the idea that Tesla’s value may depend increasingly on AI-related businesses. Yorkville Ives’ Dan Ives maintained an Outperform rating and a $500 price target, framing Tesla as a “physical AI” opportunity tied to autonomy and robotaxis. Tigress Financial’s Ivan Feinseth reiterated a Buy rating and a $550 target. These are analyst opinions, not guarantees of future performance.
18
22
The next reported test was Tesla’s third-quarter earnings, scheduled for October 21. One report cited expectations of $0.45 in earnings per share and $28.3 billion in revenue. Results and guidance could help investors judge whether the company’s near-term business performance supports the longer-term AI narrative.
22
Overall, the October 9 gain reflected a mix of better shipment headlines and enthusiasm for Tesla’s ambitions beyond vehicle sales. Terafab strengthened the story of greater chip-supply control, but its cost and execution challenges—and the mixed picture in China—make the rally an expression of optimism, not proof those risks have been resolved.