Glassnode’s analysis puts Bitcoin’s overhead supply near $87,700–$88,000, where recent buyers may be more willing to sell near break even. Glassnode also described support near $80,000 and the True Market Mean near $78,000, leaving Bitcoin between potential support and resistance zones rather than at a confirmed bre...
Published byEdited with GPT-6 LunaImages generated with GPT Image 2
Research answer

Create a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: Why did Glassnode identify selling by Bitcoin holders who bought six to 12 months earlier as a barrier to the rally just below their $87,700. Article summary: Glassnode’s interpretation was that Bitcoin faced a supply overhang near $87,700: holders nursing losses could use a recovery toward their average purchase price to exit, limiting the rally.[7][8] That makes the level a . Topic tags: general, documentation, general web, user generated. Style: premium digital editorial illustration, source-backed research mood, clean composition, high detail, modern web publication hero. Use reference image context only for broad subject, composition, and topical grounding; do not copy the exact image. Avoid: logos, brand marks, copyrighted characters, real person likenesses, fake screenshots, UI text, readable text, watermarks,
Bitcoin’s rally faced a potential supply barrier near $87,700–$88,000: the estimated average cost basis of coins bought six to 12 months earlier. When a price recovery brings underwater investors close to break-even, some may choose to sell, adding offers that buyers must absorb. Glassnode’s analysis makes that zone a possible resistance area—not a fixed ceiling.5
11
A cost basis is an estimate of what a group of coins paid on average, not the exact purchase price of every person in that group. Still, it can help explain investor behavior: holders who have been sitting on losses may be more inclined to exit when the market returns near their estimated entry point.7
If enough holders sell into a rally, their offers can outweigh new demand and price may struggle to advance. That is the potential resistance mechanism behind the $87,700–$88,000 zone. Glassnode’s October analysis placed the six-to-12-month cohort’s cost basis at about $88,000 and said this level, alongside other overhead supply, had turned price back earlier in the year.11
There is an important distinction between the cohort that sets the break-even reference and the cohort Glassnode said was selling. In an October 13 post, the firm said one-to-two-year holders sold heavily as Bitcoin rallied toward $88,000, where the six-to-12-month group would break even; it added that the older cohort’s selling had since slowed considerably.16
Resistance is not permanent. If buyers keep purchasing through sell orders and Bitcoin sustains a move above the zone, the market would show that available supply had been absorbed. Glassnode said that a daily close above the area alongside ETF inflows would indicate buyers were absorbing supply.28
A former resistance level can then become a support reference if buyers step in when price revisits it. But neither a close above the level nor a retest guarantees that support will hold; they are evidence to assess alongside demand and price behavior, not proof of a future direction.
Glassnode’s October 14 report described Bitcoin as caught between overhead cost-basis supply and support lower down. It placed the six-to-12-month cohort’s basis near $88,000, the one-to-two-year cohort near $100,000, and the True Market Mean—its estimate of the average cost basis of active investors—near $78,000. The report also said bids had refilled after Bitcoin swept to about $80,000.11
That makes the $80,000 area a support reference, not a guaranteed floor. Order-book bids can change, and an estimated cohort cost basis does not require holders to buy or sell. If Bitcoin holds near support, the market may remain rangebound; a decisive move through overhead supply or a loss of support would change that picture. Those are conditional scenarios, not price predictions.
Glassnode defines its True Market Mean as a representative cost-basis model for active investors, while its cohort estimates group coins by when they were acquired.1
11 Such averages can clarify where a group may be near break-even, but they do not reveal the intentions of every holder. Treat the $87,700–$88,000 level as a potential area of selling interest—and look for evidence of sustained demand before calling a breakout.
Studio Global AI
This page includes a source-backed answer you can continue inside Studio Global.
Glassnode’s analysis puts Bitcoin’s overhead supply near $87,700–$88,000, where recent buyers may be more willing to sell near break even.
Glassnode’s analysis puts Bitcoin’s overhead supply near $87,700–$88,000, where recent buyers may be more willing to sell near break even. Glassnode also described support near $80,000 and the True Market Mean near $78,000, leaving Bitcoin between potential support and resistance zones rather than at a confirmed breakout point.[11]
Glassnode’s analysis puts Bitcoin’s overhead supply near $87,700–$88,000, where recent buyers may be more willing to sell near break even. Glassnode also described support near $80,000 and the True Market Mean near $78,000, leaving Bitcoin between potential support and resistance zones rather than at a confirmed bre...
Published byEdited with GPT-6 LunaImages generated with GPT Image 2
Research answer

Create a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: Why did Glassnode identify selling by Bitcoin holders who bought six to 12 months earlier as a barrier to the rally just below their $87,700. Article summary: Glassnode’s interpretation was that Bitcoin faced a supply overhang near $87,700: holders nursing losses could use a recovery toward their average purchase price to exit, limiting the rally.[7][8] That makes the level a . Topic tags: general, documentation, general web, user generated. Style: premium digital editorial illustration, source-backed research mood, clean composition, high detail, modern web publication hero. Use reference image context only for broad subject, composition, and topical grounding; do not copy the exact image. Avoid: logos, brand marks, copyrighted characters, real person likenesses, fake screenshots, UI text, readable text, watermarks,
Bitcoin’s rally faced a potential supply barrier near $87,700–$88,000: the estimated average cost basis of coins bought six to 12 months earlier. When a price recovery brings underwater investors close to break-even, some may choose to sell, adding offers that buyers must absorb. Glassnode’s analysis makes that zone a possible resistance area—not a fixed ceiling.5
11
A cost basis is an estimate of what a group of coins paid on average, not the exact purchase price of every person in that group. Still, it can help explain investor behavior: holders who have been sitting on losses may be more inclined to exit when the market returns near their estimated entry point.7
If enough holders sell into a rally, their offers can outweigh new demand and price may struggle to advance. That is the potential resistance mechanism behind the $87,700–$88,000 zone. Glassnode’s October analysis placed the six-to-12-month cohort’s cost basis at about $88,000 and said this level, alongside other overhead supply, had turned price back earlier in the year.11
There is an important distinction between the cohort that sets the break-even reference and the cohort Glassnode said was selling. In an October 13 post, the firm said one-to-two-year holders sold heavily as Bitcoin rallied toward $88,000, where the six-to-12-month group would break even; it added that the older cohort’s selling had since slowed considerably.16
Resistance is not permanent. If buyers keep purchasing through sell orders and Bitcoin sustains a move above the zone, the market would show that available supply had been absorbed. Glassnode said that a daily close above the area alongside ETF inflows would indicate buyers were absorbing supply.28
A former resistance level can then become a support reference if buyers step in when price revisits it. But neither a close above the level nor a retest guarantees that support will hold; they are evidence to assess alongside demand and price behavior, not proof of a future direction.
Glassnode’s October 14 report described Bitcoin as caught between overhead cost-basis supply and support lower down. It placed the six-to-12-month cohort’s basis near $88,000, the one-to-two-year cohort near $100,000, and the True Market Mean—its estimate of the average cost basis of active investors—near $78,000. The report also said bids had refilled after Bitcoin swept to about $80,000.11
That makes the $80,000 area a support reference, not a guaranteed floor. Order-book bids can change, and an estimated cohort cost basis does not require holders to buy or sell. If Bitcoin holds near support, the market may remain rangebound; a decisive move through overhead supply or a loss of support would change that picture. Those are conditional scenarios, not price predictions.
Glassnode defines its True Market Mean as a representative cost-basis model for active investors, while its cohort estimates group coins by when they were acquired.1
11 Such averages can clarify where a group may be near break-even, but they do not reveal the intentions of every holder. Treat the $87,700–$88,000 level as a potential area of selling interest—and look for evidence of sustained demand before calling a breakout.
Studio Global AI
This page includes a source-backed answer you can continue inside Studio Global.
Glassnode’s analysis puts Bitcoin’s overhead supply near $87,700–$88,000, where recent buyers may be more willing to sell near break even.
Glassnode’s analysis puts Bitcoin’s overhead supply near $87,700–$88,000, where recent buyers may be more willing to sell near break even. Glassnode also described support near $80,000 and the True Market Mean near $78,000, leaving Bitcoin between potential support and resistance zones rather than at a confirmed breakout point.[11]