That view implies that the sector’s structural growth story—European rearmament—remains intact.
Among European defense names, Rheinmetall stood out after the downturn.
The stock had fallen sharply—about 45% from its previous high and briefly approached the €1,100 level before recovering—creating what Citi viewed as a more attractive entry point.
Several factors supported the upgrade:
In other words, the fundamentals had not deteriorated nearly as much as the stock price suggested.
Saab’s rating change was more modest. Citi moved the stock from Sell to Neutral and slightly increased its price target to 527 SEK from 516 SEK following the sector’s pullback.
The reasoning was primarily about risk‑reward rather than outright bullishness.
Earlier, Citi had argued that Saab’s valuation required very optimistic assumptions about future growth. After the selloff, those expectations became more reasonable, making the bearish call harder to justify—even if the bank still did not see enough upside to recommend buying the shares outright.
Citi’s rating changes also reflect a broader sector view. If investor sentiment toward defense stocks stabilizes later in the year, companies that experienced the steepest declines but still have strong structural demand could rebound first.
Rheinmetall, with its scale and backlog, fits that profile particularly well, while Saab’s improved valuation reduces the downside risk.
Citigroup’s upgrades were essentially a valuation and timing call after an oversold moment in the sector. Political headlines about Ukraine peace talks and uncertainty around funding Europe’s defense expansion triggered a sharp selloff, but Citi believes the market reaction may have been excessive.
With persistent security concerns in Europe, strong order visibility for key contractors, and ongoing rearmament plans, the bank sees better risk‑reward for Rheinmetall and a more balanced outlook for Saab despite lingering uncertainties.
Comments
0 comments