Bitcoin (BTC) bore the heaviest losses. On June 3, Bitcoin liquidations totaled between $662.4 million and $693.6 million, with approximately 91.3% of those positions being longs . On June 4, another $198 million in Bitcoin positions were liquidated, of which $169.5 million (85.6%) came from forced long closures
.
Ethereum (ETH) suffered the second-largest blow, with $367.8 million to $473.8 million liquidated on June 3, almost entirely from long positions . By June 4, total Ethereum liquidations had climbed to roughly $386 million for the day, cementing its status as the hardest-hit altcoin
.
Solana (SOL) saw a smaller but highly directional wipeout: $76.3 million liquidated on June 3, with an extreme 97.1% of those closures hitting long traders . Solana’s intraday price drop of more than 8% reflected the intensity of the long-side capitulation
.
Bitcoin’s spot price fell to a four-month low of $61,300–$61,351 on June 4, placing it dangerously close to the psychologically critical $60,000 support zone . The decline had been building for weeks. Bitcoin lost more than 25% over the prior month and was trading roughly 50% below its all-time high of approximately $126,000, which it reached in October 2025
.
Ethereum tracked Bitcoin lower, falling to $1,862 on June 3—a 5.3% single-day decline—before sliding further toward $1,789 by June 4 as the selloff extended .
While the liquidation figures suggest overwhelming bearish momentum, the derivatives market is now flashing a classic counter-signal. Three conditions have aligned that historically precede explosive upside reversals:
1. Contracted Open Interest: Open interest across futures markets contracted sharply as leveraged positions were flushed out, effectively resetting the market’s speculative excess . This deleveraging reduces the fuel for further cascading liquidations.
2. Persistently Negative Funding Rates: Perpetual swap funding rates remained deeply negative throughout the selloff, a signal that the market is now crowded with short positions betting on continued declines. Negative funding rates create a structural cost for shorts, making their positions expensive to hold over time .
3. Asymmetric Liquidation Clusters: With open interest reset and funding rates negative, the market’s liquidation profile is now lopsided. While long liquidation clusters sit near $63,000, an estimated $3.5 billion in short positions are vulnerable to a squeeze if Bitcoin can reclaim the $70,000 level .
This combination—a contraction in open interest, extreme bearish positioning, and negative funding rates—has historically been the mechanical precondition for a short squeeze, particularly if Bitcoin can break back above the $65,000–$70,000 resistance range .
Downside support: The $60,000 zone is the last major defense before Bitcoin tests the realized price floor near $54,000. On-chain data shows that roughly 24.6% of Bitcoin’s realized capitalization sits between $54,000 and $75,000, a concentration that has historically marked major cycle bottoms in 2018 and 2022 .
Overhead resistance: The $65,000–$70,000 range now acts as overhead resistance, with $65,000 representing former support that failed during the selloff. A sustained move above $70,000 would invalidate the fear-driven momentum and could trigger the asymmetric short-squeeze scenario described above .
Looming over the technical picture is the unresolved Mt. Gox distribution risk. The rehabilitation trustee still holds approximately 34,504 BTC worth about $2.43 billion, the largest unresolved holding tied to any failed crypto exchange . On June 2—just before the selloff accelerated—the trustee moved 10,422 BTC (roughly $739 million) to a new wallet, the largest such transfer in months
.
The final creditor repayment deadline has been extended multiple times, from the original October 31, 2023 date to October 31, 2024, then to October 31, 2025, and now to October 31, 2026 . While approximately 19,500 creditors have received funds since repayments began in mid-2024, the remaining 34,504 BTC represent a persistent supply overhang that weighs on market sentiment, even if the actual distribution is still months away
.
Comments
0 comments