Back in Somalia, Artan was greeted as a hero. Thousands gathered in Mogadishu to welcome him, and his exclusion drew widespread condemnation within the country . In an interview from Istanbul before his return, Artan said he was “very, very disappointed” that his lifelong dream had been crushed at the airport
.
A separate but equally contentious case unfolded at the Canadian border. Ghanaian midfielder Thomas Partey was denied a visa to enter Canada, causing him to miss Ghana’s World Cup opener against Panama in Toronto on June 17 . Partey had traveled with his team to the United States and trained at their base camp in Boston without issue
. However, Canadian authorities refused his application based on unresolved criminal proceedings in the United Kingdom.
Partey faces multiple charges in London—five counts of rape and one of sexual assault, to which he has pleaded not guilty . Because the charges have not resulted in a conviction, Ghana’s government launched an official protest. Sports Minister Kofi Adams called the rationale “flimsy” and “profoundly unjust,” while Ghana’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs argued the decision ran contrary to the principle of presumed innocence
. FIFA confirmed Partey’s absence but declined to intervene, mirroring its hands-off posture in Artan’s case
.
Iran’s World Cup campaign became entangled in a diplomatic tug-of-war over U.S. visas. While all 26 players on the final roster eventually received entry permits, more than a dozen support staff and senior football federation officials were initially rejected . Among those denied were secretary-general Hedayat Mombeini and vice president Mehdi Mohammad Nabi, two of the most senior figures in Iran’s football administration
.
The dispute had been simmering for months. In November 2025, Iran boycotted the World Cup draw in Washington after the U.S. denied visas to federation president Mehdi Taj and other officials . By the time the team arrived in Mexico for pre-tournament preparation, 15 staff members still lacked U.S. entry clearance
.
Iranian officials reacted sharply. The Iran Football Federation accused the U.S. of “vindictive behavior” and “the worst possible form of politically biased interference in sport” . Forward Mehdi Taremi said the visa policies were creating “a lot of tension” and damaging the host nation’s image
. As of June 13, 2026, four Iranian staffers had won appeals, but 11 others remained barred from U.S. entry
.
The visa turmoil extended far beyond teams and officials. An analysis by the BBC found that fans from more than a quarter of the 48 participating nations faced significant visa denial rates or outright travel restrictions when trying to reach U.S. venues .
Moroccan supporters, in particular, reported widespread rejections despite having purchased tickets and booked flights . The U.S. travel bans, reinstated and expanded under the Trump administration, now affect nationals from 39 countries. For 19 of those nations, the State Department halted all visa issuances entirely
. Among the affected World Cup participants are Iran, Senegal, Haiti, and Ivory Coast—meaning ordinary fans from those countries had virtually no legal path to attend matches in the United States
.
Even before the tournament began, an internal State Department directive temporarily suspended visa processing for applicants from 75 countries, including major football nations like Brazil, Colombia, and Egypt, sparking panic among ticket holders .
Faced with mounting pressure from national federations, human rights groups, and fans, FIFA President Gianni Infantino offered a response that critics found remarkably detached. Speaking in Mexico City on June 10, just one day before the tournament’s opening match, Infantino said FIFA “cannot dictate to the U.S. government who to allow into its country” .
He addressed Artan’s exclusion directly, calling it “unfortunate” but insisting that the organization had no leverage to reverse immigration decisions. His broader advice to concerned parties was to “chill and relax” over the visa controversies . The remarks drew immediate backlash from Iranian players and immigration advocates, who pointed out that FIFA had not publicly pressured the host governments to honor the spirit of a global tournament
.
The underlying problem, as multiple analyses noted, is structural. FIFA had initially pushed for a unified travel system akin to Qatar’s Hayya Card, which would have allowed accredited participants to move freely among the three host nations. The U.S. government rejected the proposal, leaving fans and teams to navigate a messy patchwork of separate visa regimes . The result is a World Cup where border policy often overrules the pitch.