The Moment Fans Never Saw: Why the Tour de France Femmes Is Finally Facing Its Coverage Problem

But the missed moment was a tipping point. TNT Sports presenter Orla Chennaoui used the incident to publicly challenge race organisers ASO. “ASO, what are you doing?” she asked on air, calling the limited coverage a “disservice to women's racing” . The Cyclists' Alliance and multiple riders and sports directors joined the criticism, with words like “sad,” “strange,” and “a shame” used to describe the broadcast situation .

The coverage gap: the numbers

Currently, only 3 of the 9 stages of the Tour de France Femmes — stage 1, stage 5, and the final stage — receive full flag-to-flag live broadcasts . The other six stages receive between two and three hours of coverage, which means large portions of the early racing are routinely missed .

By comparison, the men's Tour de France is broadcast in its entirety — every stage, every kilometre .

Financial reality: why full coverage isn't automatic

Producing a full day of live helicopter and motorbike coverage is expensive. ASO has historically pointed to cost as a constraint . There is no suggestion yet that a full 9-stage broadcast has been approved or funded for 2027.

However, the commercial case has shifted. Viewing figures for women's cycling have “exploded,” according to multiple reports, and roadside crowds for the women's race have matched or exceeded expectations . The argument from both critics and insiders is that the audience now justifies the production cost in a way it may not have in earlier editions .

What the race director is saying

Marion Rousse, race director of the Tour de France Femmes, has confirmed that full flag-to-flag coverage of every stage is under active discussion. In an exclusive interview with Cycling Weekly, she said the topic is being given “serious consideration” and that “there's a real discussion to be had” . Rousse noted that she has discussed the matter extensively with France Télévisions, the host broadcaster, and with ASO. She said the women's race has proven itself and that the riders deserve full coverage .

The decision ultimately rests with ASO and its broadcast partners. No formal commitment for the 2027 edition has been made, but Rousse's public statements signal that the pressure — from riders, broadcasters, and the audience — is being heard at the highest level .

Advocacy is growing

The Haugset missed-attack moment has become a rallying point. Chennaoui's on-air criticism was amplified by riders like Demi Vollering, who earlier in the season had called the disparity in coverage “unfair” after her Liège-Bastogne-Liège win was given only a short broadcast window . The Cyclists' Alliance has described the reduced coverage as a “massive affront to women's cycling” .

Similar dynamics have played out at other races. At Paris-Roubaix Femmes in 2026, only the final 90 minutes of the race were broadcast, despite the edition being the first to run on the same day as the men's race . The pattern — women's racing treated as a broadcast afterthought — is no longer being accepted quietly.

A logical next step

Social media has also pushed for change. An Instagram post tracking broadcast hours noted that while total women's cycling TV hours rose 15.3% from 2025 to 2026 (from 25h 45m to 27h 40m), only 3 of 9 stages still get full coverage. The post concluded: “The audience has shown up. Full live coverage for all 9 stages in 2027 is the logical next step.”

Whether that step is taken depends on ASO's willingness to invest. But the public case — argued in news headlines, by broadcasters, and by the riders themselves — is now hard to ignore.