Tesla drivers in China are mounting $10–$30 plastic doll heads of celebrities like Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo, and Dwayne Johnson near the rearview mirror to fool the cabin camera into registering an attentive dr... The practice originated with a Chinese Tesla owner who began selling the figures on e commerce p...

In mid-June 2026, reports surfaced of a bizarre and dangerous trend among Tesla owners in China: they are buying tiny plastic doll heads of celebrities—including FIFA World Cup stars Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo, as well as Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson—and using them to trick their cars' driver-monitoring cameras . It sounds like a joke, but the safety implications are serious. The hack turns a critical safeguard into a prop, allowing drivers to take their eyes off the road, use their phones, or even fall asleep while the car's assisted-driving features are engaged.
Tesla vehicles equipped with Autopilot or Full Self-Driving (Supervised) use a cabin-facing camera, typically mounted above the rearview mirror, to monitor driver attentiveness . The system is designed to detect whether the driver's eyes are on the road and to issue escalating warnings—eventually disabling the feature—if the driver appears distracted
.
The workaround is startlingly simple. By placing a small plastic doll head on a suction cup directly in front of the camera, owners can present a static "face" that the camera interprets as a human head watching the road . Because the doll never looks away, the system never triggers an inattention warning. One Tesla Model 3 owner told Wired that they used a figurine during a trip and drove for about 30 minutes without any alerts
.
This method is part of a broader "cottage industry" of DIY gadgets that Wired described in June 2026, including blinking screens and printed photos, all aimed at bypassing Tesla's distracted-driving controls .
The trend appears to have started with a single Tesla owner in China who began manufacturing and selling the miniature heads on Chinese e-commerce sites . The products are often marketed innocuously as "travel companions" or "dashboard decorations" to evade scrutiny
.
Prices vary depending on the source, but they are uniformly cheap:
Wired was among the first English-language outlets to cover the phenomenon in detail. In a mid-June 2026 report, the magazine called the trend a "cottage industry of celebrity figurines, blinking screens, and other DIY gadgets" designed to bypass Tesla's distracted-driving controls . They characterized it as a serious safety risk that undermines the core promise of supervised autonomy: that a human is always ready to take over
.
Electrek followed on June 15, 2026, confirming that the devices sell for as little as $20 to $50 on Chinese e-commerce platforms . The outlet noted that this is only the latest escalation in an ongoing arms race between Tesla's driver-monitoring safeguards and aftermarket device makers determined to defeat them. Electrek also highlighted Tesla's previous enforcement actions—the company has remotely disabled Full Self-Driving access for owners caught using similar "nag defeat" devices and warned them they would be "100% liable for any accident" that occurs while the device is active
.
Both publications described the practice as incredibly dangerous because it removes the only meaningful backup when a Level 2 system makes an error. Full Self-Driving (Supervised), despite its name, is not autonomous; it requires constant human supervision and immediate intervention capability . A plastic doll head provides neither.
The doll-head hack is specifically designed to fool the driver-monitoring loop that activates when Full Self-Driving (Supervised) is engaged. In Australia, that system is not yet available for public use.
As of mid-2026, no Australian state or territory has granted regulatory approval for FSD on public roads . Tesla's country director for Australia and New Zealand, Thom Drew, stated in mid-2025 that there were "no regulatory blockers" and that the company was in the final stages of validation, but the rollout had not yet occurred
. Some limited testing has been observed on Australian roads, but it was conducted under specific exemptions and was not open to consumers
.
The regulatory picture is further complicated by the fact that some Tesla owners have launched legal action against the company, alleging they paid more than $10,000 for FSD software that may never be usable on their vehicles . While Tesla has shifted to a subscription-only model for FSD in Australia, the core point stands: without active FSD, the specific driver-attentiveness monitoring loop that the dolls exploit is not a factor for local drivers.
Tesla vehicles in Australia do have cabin cameras that monitor attention for other features like Autopilot, but the FSD-based monitoring system that the hack targets remains inactive until regulatory approval is secured . So while the figurines might look amusing on an Australian dashboard, they serve no practical bypass function—at least for now.
Studio Global AI
Use this topic as a starting point for a fresh source-backed answer, then compare citations before you share it.


Tesla drivers in China are mounting $10–$30 plastic doll heads of celebrities like Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo, and Dwayne Johnson near the rearview mirror to fool the cabin camera into registering an attentive dr...
Tesla drivers in China are mounting $10–$30 plastic doll heads of celebrities like Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo, and Dwayne Johnson near the rearview mirror to fool the cabin camera into registering an attentive dr... The practice originated with a Chinese Tesla owner who began selling the figures on e commerce platforms, and outlets like Wired and Electrek have called it a serious safety threat that undermines the entire premise o...
The hack has no practical purpose in Australia because Full Self Driving (Supervised) is not yet permitted on public roads, though Tesla is working toward regulatory approval.
Loading comments...
Comments
0 comments