The market’s willingness to grant that higher multiple is perhaps the most uncertain variable in his model . Still, even in a conservative scenario where the P/E multiple drops to 12, Hayes values HYPE at around $58 — a 75% upside from its level at the time of the analysis
. His conviction extends far beyond that baseline, however. Hayes has separately floated a "terminal value" thesis suggesting a 126x upside if Hyperliquid captures a meaningful share of the stablecoin market, which would imply a far greater long-term valuation
.
The cornerstone of Hayes’s bullish case is not just that Hyperliquid generates significant revenue, but what it does with that revenue. An estimated 97% of the platform’s fees are used for open-market buybacks of the HYPE token . This mechanism, which has already deployed over $1.16 billion to repurchase tokens, creates a structural, continuous source of demand that removes tokens from circulation
.
This is the heart of Hayes’s argument against competing layer-1 chains. He positions HYPE’s deflationary tokenomics — where buybacks exceed new token issuance — in direct opposition to the inflationary structure of networks like Solana, which he argues consistently dilute their token supply . The model creates a feedback loop: more trading activity leads to higher revenue, which leads to more buybacks, which increases the price, which attracts more attention and activity. For Hayes, this is a defensible, yield-generating flywheel that most crypto assets cannot replicate
.
Hayes’s words carry weight, but his willingness to stake capital on them turned the thesis into a spectacle. In February 2026, responding to public criticism of Hyperliquid by Multicoin Capital co-founder Kyle Samani, Hayes issued a public challenge .
He wagered $100,000 that HYPE would outperform any altcoin with a market capitalization over $1 billion that Samani chose, between February 10 and July 31, 2026. The loser was to donate the money to a charity of the winner’s choice . The bet effectively reframed the debate from a philosophical argument about Hyperliquid’s design to a pure price test, an area where Hayes has repeatedly demonstrated confidence
. As of publication, Samani had not formally accepted the wager
.
Critics often dismiss bold price targets as marketing, but Hayes has aligned his fund’s capital with his thesis. He named HYPE as Maelstrom’s largest single altcoin position and disclosed personal holdings of over 131,000 HYPE tokens, which were valued at more than $4.3 million at the time of the disclosure . Maelstrom also participated in Hyperliquid’s early funding rounds, giving the fund a cost basis and perspective that may predate the public market frenzy
. He stated plainly that his team was actively buying more HYPE while selling other assets, a signal that the position was not just a hold but a conviction-driven accumulation
.
The $150 price target is part of a much larger claim. Hayes has stated that his “degen target” for this market cycle is for HYPE to flip Solana and enter the list of the top ten cryptocurrencies by market capitalization .
He bases this on three interlocking arguments:
Hayes’s HYPE thesis cannot be understood in isolation from his larger macro framework, which he laid out in stark terms at Consensus Miami in May 2026. There, he dismissed pending U.S. crypto legislation, including the CLARITY Act, as entirely irrelevant to the valuation of crypto assets .
His core argument is that the price of Bitcoin — and by extension, the entire crypto market — is a function of a single variable: the quantity of fiat currency in circulation . “The more money that is printed in the US and around the world, the more value that Bitcoin will have in fiat currencies,” he argued, adding that regulation is noise that neither creates nor destroys the monetary expansion that pushes capital into scarce digital assets
.
He argued that the CLARITY Act “will bring nothing unless it triggers more money printing” and stated his hope that President Trump would veto it, arguing that crypto’s value proposition is its operation outside of any regulatory apparatus . To Hayes, legislative frameworks benefit centralized companies with lobbying resources, not the decentralized ecosystem of assets like HYPE
.
All of Hayes’s positions — the $150 HYPE target, the Solana-flipping call, the $100,000 bet, and the dismissal of the CLARITY Act — are unified by a single bet on fiat debasement. He argues that central banks in the U.S., Europe, and Japan will be forced to continue printing money to manage sovereign debt burdens, creating a multi-year tailwind for fixed-supply or deflationary assets . He has explicitly rejected any talk of a market cycle top or an impending bear market, extending his bullish outlook through at least 2028 and reaffirming a $125,000 Bitcoin target alongside his HYPE call
.
The thesis is coherent and audacious: more fiat printing creates more liquidity, which flows into Bitcoin and then into high-conviction altcoins. Among those, Hayes argues, HYPE is the most structurally sound because of its buyback-driven deflationary mechanism. In his view, regulation will not stop this process because it does not address the root driver. The $150 target is a numeric expression of that belief, a calculated bet that the market will price Hyperliquid more like a mature financial exchange as its revenue compounds and its token supply contracts.
Comments
0 comments