Saudi Arabia’s official selling prices (OSPs) for Asia are set as a differential over the Oman/Dubai benchmark. That differential soared to a record $19.50 per barrel for May loading, the highest in history . This was a direct response to the physical supply squeeze caused by the Strait of Hormuz blockade, which at its peak disrupted around 20% of global oil supplies
.
During the height of the crisis in March, the Dubai cash-to-swaps premium surged to an all-time high of approximately $65 per barrel . The spot market was signaling an acute physical shortage, and Saudi Arabia’s OSPs reflected that reality. By May, however, the Dubai cash premium had collapsed to around $8.90 per barrel, down from $13.92 in April
. The July OSP cut is simply catching up to a spot market that has already re-priced sharply lower, with a typical one-month lag.
The demand side of the equation makes the cut unavoidable. Saudi Arabia’s largest Asian customers—China, Japan, South Korea, India, and Taiwan—are all cutting their crude nominations . Cargoes scheduled to sail from Saudi Arabia in May fell to historic lows of roughly 3.9 million barrels per day
.
China, the kingdom's biggest customer, exemplifies the trend. Its Saudi crude nominations have been declining since March, and are expected to fall to about 600,000 barrels per day in June, roughly half of April's volume . When term buyers stop nominating barrels, the seller has two choices: cut prices or lose the customers permanently to cheaper alternatives, including Russian, West African, and Emirati grades.
The pressure to cut prices goes beyond short-term demand weakness. The UAE's exit from OPEC has fundamentally altered the competitive landscape for Asian market share . Analysts have explicitly noted that Saudi price cuts could go further in the coming months precisely because of this intensified rivalry
.
The kingdom is in a classic strategic bind: it can defend revenue per barrel through high prices, or it can defend the volume of barrels sold through competitive pricing, but not both. The July OSP cut signals a clear choice to prioritize market share, preventing Asian buyers from locking in long-term contracts with rival suppliers .
The $3–$8 per barrel range reflects the unprecedented uncertainty in the current market. In 2020, when market signals were similarly chaotic, Bloomberg survey estimates for Saudi OSP cuts ranged from $0.50 to $7.50 per barrel, with analysts saying conflicting signals were responsible for the lack of consensus .
A $3–$8 reduction from the June OSP of $15.50 per barrel would bring the differential to a range of $7.50–$12.50 over Oman/Dubai. This would still be elevated by historical standards—in calmer years, premiums have ranged from $1.90 to $3.65 —but would better align with the new market reality where the flat price has fallen 19%, spot differentials have more than halved, and the Hormuz risk premium is steadily deflating.
It is important to note that the Hormuz shipping situation remains unresolved. Despite the ceasefire progress, the waterway has been disrupted for nearly three months, and traffic remains far below normal levels . Some analysts caution there is little evidence of material movement toward a full reopening, and the situation could be a rebranded stalemate rather than a genuine de-escalation
.
Any setback in negotiations could rapidly re-inflate risk premiums. But for July loading cargoes, the price signal is already clear: the crisis premium that justified record OSPs is gone, and Saudi Arabia is pricing its crude accordingly.
Comments
0 comments