According to Fico, Zelenskyy told him during a personal meeting in Armenia that he was prepared to meet Putin “in any format.” Fico said he conveyed that position to the Russian side during his Moscow visit, and then said Zelenskyy should call Putin directly if he wanted a meeting.
That framing placed Fico in the role of messenger. He was not merely saying Zelenskyy supports diplomacy; he was claiming he had transmitted Zelenskyy’s readiness for direct contact to Moscow.
The Kremlin disputed the handoff. Putin aide Yuri Ushakov said Fico had not passed on any “messages” from Zelenskyy during the May 9 Moscow meeting, although Ukraine was discussed and Fico mentioned his recent meeting with Zelenskyy.
Ushakov’s account drew a line between discussing Ukraine and carrying an authorized message. He said Zelenskyy had shared his assessment of the situation with Fico, but had not asked Fico to pass anything on to Putin.
Kyiv did not publicly adopt every part of Fico’s wording. Presidential adviser Dmytro Lytvyn said Zelenskyy had told Fico that Ukraine wants the war to end, needs “worthy solutions,” and is ready for a leaders’ meeting aimed at ending the war.
That statement keeps open the possibility of leader-level diplomacy, but it does not settle whether Fico was asked to deliver a message to Putin.
The dispute is less about whether direct talks are imaginable and more about authorization and framing. Fico presented himself as having conveyed Zelenskyy’s readiness to Moscow; the Kremlin said no message was passed; Kyiv emphasized Ukraine’s broader diplomatic position rather than validating Fico’s exact account.
| Side | What they said | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Fico | Zelenskyy told him in Armenia he was ready to meet Putin “in any format,” and Fico said he conveyed that to the Russian side. | This presents Fico as an intermediary. |
| Kremlin | Ukraine was discussed, but Fico did not pass any Zelenskyy “messages.” | This rejects the idea of a formal or authorized handoff. |
| Kyiv | Ukraine is ready for a leaders’ meeting focused on ending the war, with “worthy solutions” needed. | This confirms openness to leader-level talks, but not necessarily Fico’s version of events. |
The safest conclusion is narrow: Fico claimed he relayed Zelenskyy’s readiness for a direct meeting with Putin; the Kremlin denied receiving a Zelenskyy message through Fico; and Kyiv described Ukraine as ready for leader-level talks focused on ending the war, without fully endorsing Fico’s version of the handoff.
That leaves the most sensitive point unresolved in the public record: whether Fico was an authorized messenger, or whether he was publicly interpreting a private conversation with Zelenskyy after his Moscow meeting.