Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang described the company’s business with Singapore-based cloud customer Megaspeed International as “normal and not unusual” on October 29, 2026. The response followed a New York Times report that U.S. intelligence officials assessed former Megaspeed executive Alice Huang, also known as Huang Le, as gathering information for China. Nvidia disputed the chip-diversion allegations; the reported intelligence assessment is not a public judicial finding.
1
5
16
35
What Huang and Nvidia said
Huang characterized Nvidia’s dealings with Megaspeed as routine. Nvidia also defended his interactions with Alice Huang as ordinary business contact, according to a report quoting the company’s spokesperson.
35
36
The company’s response addressed earlier claims that Megaspeed helped divert Nvidia chips to China. Nvidia said those allegations had been “thoroughly investigated and debunked last year.” That is Nvidia’s characterization; the statement alone does not independently resolve the allegations.
5
16
A report published the following day said Nvidia had reviewed Megaspeed’s GPU deployments. The available account does not detail the scope or findings of that review.
42
What the espionage report alleged
The New York Times, citing people briefed on classified intelligence reports, said U.S. officials assessed Alice Huang as a Chinese intelligence asset who passed information to Beijing. It also reported that she had developed a close relationship with Jensen Huang. These are reported intelligence conclusions and allegations, not publicly established findings in court.
1
2
Coverage of the Times report said President Donald Trump had been briefed about the intelligence roughly a year earlier and took no further action. The available reports do not establish the full contents of that briefing.
5
9
Why Megaspeed was under scrutiny
Reporting said U.S. authorities had been investigating Megaspeed since late 2024, amid concerns that the company could help Chinese businesses access advanced Nvidia chips despite U.S. export restrictions.
37
38
Trade records cited in that coverage showed that Megaspeed’s Malaysian sister company purchased at least $4.8 billion in advanced AI equipment containing Nvidia technology between June 2024 and February 2026. Those purchases are part of the reported context; they do not, by themselves, establish that equipment was illegally diverted.
38
What the reporting does—and doesn’t—establish
The central distinction is between Nvidia’s public response and the intelligence claims reported by the Times. Huang called the business relationship routine, and Nvidia said the diversion allegations had been debunked. Separately, the Times reported that U.S. intelligence officials suspected Alice Huang of gathering information for China. The available reporting does not turn that assessment into a public legal finding, nor does it independently settle the chip-diversion allegations.
1
5
16