The Kremlin has rejected reports that Russia is preparing a new mass mobilization. Speaking to Russian media outlet RTVI on August 25, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov called the reports fabricated stories and accused Ukrainian authorities of trying to “ideologically destabilize” Russian society by placing them in the information space.
1
3
4
That denial conflicts with warnings from Ukrainian officials, who say Moscow may need more personnel to sustain its war effort. The evidence available here establishes competing claims—not a confirmed new Russian mobilization order.
What Peskov said
Peskov’s response was both a denial and an accusation. He rejected the idea that the reports reflected an actual Kremlin plan and said Ukrainian authorities were deliberately spreading them to create anxiety and destabilize Russia politically.
1
4
The Kremlin’s position has been consistent in public statements cited in the available reporting: Russian officials say a large-scale call-up is not currently needed and that the armed forces can be staffed through contract recruitment. Russia’s permanent representative to the United Nations, Vasily Nebenzya, said mobilization was “not planned or expected, as far as I know,” while adding that the post-election situation could still be watched.
32
34
What Zelenskyy claims
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has presented a sharply different assessment. He said Russia could mobilize at least 300,000 additional troops later in 2026, potentially after September’s State Duma elections, to support continued operations in Ukraine.
11
19
Zelenskyy also claimed that Russia had suffered 267,000 personnel losses since the beginning of 2026, including approximately 155,000 killed. Those figures are Ukrainian assessments and have not been independently confirmed in the cited reporting.
11
21
22
Earlier, Zelenskyy said Russian casualties were beginning to exceed recruitment, citing nearly 225,500 casualties against about 221,000 people joining the armed forces during the first part of the year. Those numbers also come from Ukrainian statements and should be treated as claims rather than settled totals.
13
26
29
Other denials—and contrary indicators
Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council, dismissed reports of an autumn mobilization as untrue and described them as a Ukrainian provocation ahead of the elections.
38
40 In March, he had also said there was no current need for another mobilization because contract soldiers were sufficient for the military’s stated tasks.
44
45
At the same time, Ukrainian military intelligence has pointed to what it describes as signs that Russia is preparing for a possible expansion of recruitment. One reported indicator was a slowdown in contract recruitment; the same reporting cited official figures of roughly 200,000 defense-ministry contracts and 16,000 volunteers during the first half of 2026. These are intelligence and media claims, not independent confirmation that a mobilization decision has been made.
39
A NATO-linked review said that no official Russian decision on a new mobilization had appeared during its May 2026 monitoring period, despite continuing rumors.
30
Why the 2022 comparison matters
The current dispute recalls September 2022, when the Kremlin denied that mobilization was being considered shortly before Putin announced a “partial mobilization” of reservists. The call-up was officially associated with roughly 300,000 personnel.
15
46
47
That history makes today’s denials politically significant, but it does not prove that a new draft is imminent. The 2022 comparison is best understood as a reason to treat official assurances cautiously—not as evidence that the same sequence will happen again.
Bottom line
Peskov’s current message is that the mobilization reports are fabricated Ukrainian information warfare intended to unsettle Russia. Zelenskyy’s message is that battlefield losses and recruitment pressures are pushing Moscow toward a new call-up of about 300,000 troops. Russian officials, including Nebenzya and Medvedev, have denied that such a move is planned.
Based on the provided evidence, the most defensible conclusion is narrower: Russia has not publicly confirmed a new mobilization order, while competing claims about its manpower needs and future plans remain unresolved.