Iran Says U.S. ‘Excessive Demands’ Are Blocking Diplomacy as Pakistan Tries to Mediate

Pakistan’s role as mediator

Pakistan has emerged as a key intermediary in the current diplomatic push. Talks between the United States and Iran have included Pakistan‑mediated negotiations and meetings hosted in Islamabad, aimed at reducing tensions and exploring possible compromises.

Islamabad has also taken direct diplomatic steps to keep the process alive. Pakistan’s powerful army chief traveled to Tehran during the negotiations, a move widely seen as part of efforts to encourage dialogue and prevent escalation.

Behind the scenes, mediators have reportedly discussed proposals intended to lower immediate tensions while postponing more difficult issues.

One reported idea involves reopening the Strait of Hormuz and stabilizing the regional security situation first, while delaying detailed negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program until later talks.

Why the Strait of Hormuz is central to the dispute

The strategic waterway at the heart of the Gulf plays a major role in the diplomacy. The Strait of Hormuz is the main shipping route for energy exports from the Persian Gulf and normally carries about one‑fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments.

Because of that, even the possibility of disruption has global implications. Negotiations since the ceasefire have not yet fully restored normal traffic conditions through the strait, adding urgency to diplomatic efforts.

Any prolonged disruption could tighten global oil supply, increase shipping risks, and push energy prices higher.

Escalation risks remain

The negotiations are unfolding amid reports that the United States has considered additional military strikes, raising concerns that diplomacy could give way to renewed confrontation.

For now, mediation efforts—especially those involving Pakistan and other regional actors—are focused on preventing escalation and finding a phased diplomatic solution. However, with disagreements over nuclear issues, sanctions, and security guarantees still unresolved, a comprehensive settlement remains uncertain.

What happens next matters far beyond Washington and Tehran: the outcome could shape regional stability and determine whether one of the world’s most important energy corridors remains secure or becomes a flashpoint in a widening crisis.