Against these figures, a $100,000–$200,000 flat fee appears almost negligible. “For me, it is better to pay a fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the size of the vessel, than to have all this hassle,” Marinakis said, suggesting the toll could even cover “damages” inflicted on Iran .
The critical realism gap, however, is significant. Marinakis’s proposed figure is far below what Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has reportedly been demanding. Reports indicate the IRGC has been charging up to $2 million per vessel to transit Hormuz, with Iran’s so-called “Persian Gulf Strait Authority” allegedly levying tolls exceeding $1 million per vessel . A $100,000 proposal is a non-starter if the actual going rate is twenty times higher.
The shipping world did not exactly line up behind Marinakis’s toll idea. At the same Posidonia forum, rival executives publicly stated that cost is a secondary concern. The primary barrier to resuming normal traffic is the complete absence of security.
Shipping leaders gathered in Athens made it clear that even if the U.S. and Iran finalize a ceasefire—discussions over a potential 60-day truce were reportedly underway in late May—commercial operators will not return without clear, enforceable rules of passage and ironclad security guarantees . The fear is not just the cost of insurance, but the risk to seafarers' lives. One executive at the forum noted that the first objective is always crew safety and evacuation, and without guarantees from warring states, ships will not re-enter a conflict zone
.
Furthermore, many operators view the act of paying a toll directly to Iran as politically radioactive and potentially in violation of international sanctions . Marinakis’s argument that “all this money can pay for all the damage” frames the toll as pragmatic compensation, but for many legal teams and flag states, any payment to a sanctioned entity under duress is a legal minefield
.
The debate over tolls is happening against a backdrop of a shipping chokepoint that has been largely paralyzed for months. The Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil supply typically flows, has been effectively closed to commercial traffic since the U.S.–Iran war escalated in early March 2026 .
A timeline of failed diplomacy and conflict:
The economic toll in numbers:
As of early June 2026, the U.S. naval blockade of Iran remains in effect, and while negotiators reportedly reached a tentative deal to reopen the strait and extend a 60-day ceasefire, the agreement is fragile and faces ongoing military escalation . The shipping industry, caught between unpayable insurance premiums and an impassable waterway, remains in a holding pattern of costly detours and mounting uncertainty. Marinakis’s toll idea, while provocative, is ultimately a reflection of an industry desperate for any predictable cost structure in a supply chain that has lost its most critical shortcut.
Comments
0 comments