Although the United States has been reviewing export policies, officials emphasized that approving or proceeding with chip purchases ultimately involves decisions on both sides. The U.S. position described the matter as a “sovereign decision” for China — meaning Washington may allow licensed sales, but Chinese companies and authorities still determine whether to proceed with purchases.
Interestingly, U.S. officials suggested the chip dispute itself was not a major focus of the Beijing meetings.
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said semiconductor export controls were “not a major topic” during the bilateral discussions, indicating that the talks covered broader diplomatic and trade issues instead of specific licensing negotiations.
This suggests that while the chip question looms large in the background of U.S.–China relations, it may be handled through separate regulatory and commercial channels rather than direct presidential bargaining.
Meanwhile, uncertainty around access to U.S. technology has pushed China to accelerate efforts to develop domestic alternatives to American AI chips.
Even though some Chinese firms have reportedly received approval to buy H200 chips, deliveries have not yet taken place, and Chinese authorities have encouraged companies to slow purchases while domestic capabilities improve.
This strategy reflects Beijing’s broader push for technological self‑reliance as export restrictions and licensing rules continue to evolve.
The Beijing discussions illustrate the complicated balance shaping the global AI race. On one hand, the U.S. and China are exploring cooperation on AI safety frameworks that could affect the entire industry. On the other, they remain locked in competition over the computing power needed to build the most advanced AI systems.
Comments
0 comments