Germany’s confrontation with Russia has taken on a “new, more dangerous” character, BND chief Martin Jaeger told lawmakers on October 5, 2026. He warned that Germany could be drawn into violent conflict as Russia’s alleged “shadow war” against Germany and other European democracies escalates. His warning describes a risk—not a prediction that a major war is imminent.
3
5
6
What Jaeger meant by a “shadow war”
Jaeger described Russia as waging an undeclared campaign against Germany and its allies. Reports on his remarks frame that threat as hybrid activity, including espionage, sabotage and other hostile operations below the level of conventional war.
1
3
11
Jaeger also said Moscow now treats Germany as a main adversary. The available reports quote that assessment but do not provide a clear, specific explanation from him for why Moscow sees Berlin that way.
2
13
Why he cited Leipzig/Halle Airport
Jaeger pointed to an attempted drone attack at Leipzig/Halle Airport as one example of the danger. Reports say the incident involved a drone near a Ukrainian cargo aircraft.
5
11
Germany later said it had concluded that Russia was responsible, citing its investigations and intelligence findings. That is the German government’s attribution; it should not be confused with an independently established finding in the reporting cited here.
20
What the warning says—and does not say—about NATO
A warning about the risk of violent conflict does not necessarily mean that German intelligence expects an imminent, large-scale Russian attack on NATO. One report on Jaeger’s remarks said the BND saw no signs of plans for such an attack.
9
The available reporting does not establish a detailed Baltic-specific assessment from Jaeger. It therefore does not support a firm conclusion about how he weighed the risk of lower-level activity in the Baltic states against the risk of a major attack on NATO.
Intelligence operations and the earlier warning
In October 2025, Jaeger said the BND would become more operational and take higher risks in its work to obtain intelligence and prepare for possible Russian escalation.
16 That points to a more risk-tolerant operational approach; the sources available here do not establish what legal powers, if any, were subsequently expanded.
The 2026 remarks were more explicit about the possible consequences for Germany: Jaeger said the country risked being drawn into violent conflict.
3
16
Moscow’s response
Moscow has repeatedly denied involvement in hybrid warfare and sabotage operations in NATO countries.
17 The reporting cited here does not establish a separate Russian response to Jaeger’s specific remarks. Germany’s attribution of the Leipzig incident to Russia and Moscow’s broader denials should therefore be treated as competing official positions.
17
20