Meta's response:
Meta has not publicly terminated payments to these accounts. The company's invitation-only programme continues to pay them despite the policy-violating content . A LinkedIn post referencing the investigation noted that the white nationalist was "being paid by Facebook's parent company, Meta, to produce content" .
What critics said:
Critics have described the programme as a system that incentivises "rage-bait" — content deliberately designed to provoke anger and engagement, which in turn generates higher advertising revenue . The International Business Times reported that the programme is "under fire" for monetising controversial content, with the $3 billion creator programme coming under renewed scrutiny .
Meta faced a major controversy in August 2026 after an investigation by Wired and the Tech Transparency Project (TTP) found that Meta approved more than 50 paid ads containing AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) . Key findings:
Meta removed the ads only after Wired contacted the company . In February 2026, Spain also announced it would investigate Meta, X, and TikTok over AI-generated CSAM .
On August 5, 2026, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg formally apologised to the Indian government over multiple issues :
The apology followed the Indian government issuing a notice to Meta over CSAM in ads in July 2026 , and a meeting where the government made clear the company "must adhere to Indian laws" .
Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses have attracted multiple privacy controversies:
Covert recording ("pervert glasses"): The glasses' built-in camera allows users to record video hands-free, leading to a wave of non-consensual recordings posted online. Instagram began cracking down on such videos in July 2026 . Fortune reported the problem had grown enough to be called a "'pervert glasses' problem" .
Secret face-recognition code: In June 2026, security researchers alleged Meta had "quietly embedded face-recognition technology for its smart glasses into an app downloaded onto millions of phones", raising mass-surveillance concerns .
European Parliament inquiry: In May 2026, the European Parliament flagged that Swedish investigative reports revealed the glasses can "record private situations and sensitive personal data without users' awareness and without the consent of the third parties concerned" — raising GDPR compliance issues .
Advocacy backlash: Over 75 advocacy organisations signed a letter in April 2026 denouncing the technology as a "dystopian invasion of privacy" that poses a "serious threat to privacy and civil liberties" .
Meta's response: Meta announced it is updating the second-generation glasses so the camera will shut off if the device detects the privacy LED has been obscured — an acknowledgement of the covert-recording problem .