Silver surged 3.45% to $70.38 on June 15 after the US Iran peace deal reopened the Strait of Hormuz, but the rally was built on falling oil and fading rate hike fears, not safe haven buying. The Fed’s June 17 hold—paired with a higher 2026 rate projection of 3.8% and a new data dependent framework—sent silver plungi...
Research answer

Create a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: What caused silver's sharp selloff this week, how did the Federal Reserve's hawkish rate projections and the US-Iran peace agreement simulta. Article summary: Silver experienced a violent two-way week, driven by the conflicting forces of a US-Iran peace deal that briefly juiced safe-haven demand, followed by a hawkish Federal Reserve that crushed it again. Here is the full bre. Topic tags: general, general web, user generated. Style: premium digital editorial illustration, source-backed research mood, clean composition, high detail, modern web publication hero. Use reference image context only for broad subject, composition, and topical grounding; do not copy the exact image. Avoid: logos, brand marks, copyrighted characters, real person likenesses, fake screenshots, UI text, readable text, watermarks, charts with fa
Silver posted one of its most volatile weeks of 2026, whipsawing between a peace-deal surge and a hawkish-Fed plunge. Understanding both the price action and the structural forces at play is critical for anyone holding silver or watching metals markets.
Stage 1 (Monday, June 15): US-Iran peace deal sparks a rally. President Trump announced a finalized peace deal with Iran that would fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz . Oil prices plunged to a two-month low, which eased inflation fears and the prospect of further rate hikes
. Silver surged 3.45% to $70.38/oz, outperforming gold's 2.95% gain
. Although it appeared to be safe-haven buying, the rally was primarily driven by falling oil reducing rate-hike risk.
Stage 2 (Wednesday–Thursday, June 17–18): The Fed's hawkish hold flips everything. The FOMC unanimously held rates at 3.50–3.75%, but new Chair Kevin Warsh delivered a markedly more hawkish message than markets expected . The median 2026 year-end rate projection rose to 3.8% (up from the prior 3.4%), and nearly half of policymakers signaled a potential rate hike later this year
. Warsh also removed traditional forward guidance, committing to a purely data-dependent framework
. Silver tumbled 2.69% to $68.67 on Wednesday alone
, then extended losses to around $66 early Thursday as hawkish Fed pressure persisted
.
How this undercut both monetary policy and safe-haven demand simultaneously: The US-Iran deal removed the primary geopolitical risk premium and crushed oil prices, which paradoxically removed the very inflation panic that had been supporting precious metals as an inflation hedge . Then the Fed stepped in to reassert higher rate expectations — raising the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding silver. Both legs of the silver thesis were kicked out at the same time.
Silver's weekly range was exceptionally wide:
From highs near $76.90 in prior weeks, silver completed a sharp leg lower back to the $62 range . The $62 level is the critical "line in the sand" — a weekly range low that bulls must defend to avoid a deeper breakdown toward $50
.
Silver has been notably more volatile than gold. On Monday, silver outperformed gold (+3.45% vs. +2.95%) , but on Wednesday silver fell 2.69% versus a smaller decline in gold
. Silver's beta to the macro news cycle remains roughly 1.2–1.5x gold's moves — it rallies harder on good news but also sells off more aggressively when the Fed turns hawkish. Silver also flashed a "sharply weaker" reading in early Thursday trading compared to gold's "lower" reading, per Kitco
.
Beyond the week's macro drama, silver faces a significant structural demand challenge:
Bank of America: Forecasts silver to reach $100/oz in Q4 2026, but then retreat to $75 by Q2 2027 as industrial demand declines — calling the rally a "peak-and-decline" pattern .
Finance Magnates technical outlook: Silver's reclaim of the 200 EMA at ~$68.91 drops price back inside the $66–$89 consolidation that has framed the metal since February. The analyst sees ~39% upside potential to $96 if the consolidation holds and the broader uptrend resumes .
Barchart technical view: The $62 level is the key bull-bear line. A clean break below $62 would open a path toward $50 support. Holding $62 with a recovery above $70 would suggest the correction was a shakeout within a larger bullish structure .
CBS News / Winmill (late May): Had forecast a 10–15% decline during June as de-hoarding supply from individuals and institutions increases, which is broadly consistent with the selloff that materialized .
The broader picture: Silver is caught in a tug-of-war between a still-present structural supply deficit (~1.07–1.09 billion oz demand vs. constrained mine supply) and demand-side erosion from solar substitution and a hawkish Fed. The metal's dual identity — half industrial commodity, half monetary metal — means it gets hit from both sides when industrial demand softens and central banks turn hawkish simultaneously.
Studio Global AI
This page includes a source-backed answer you can continue inside Studio Global.
Silver surged 3.45% to $70.38 on June 15 after the US Iran peace deal reopened the Strait of Hormuz, but the rally was built on falling oil and fading rate hike fears, not safe haven buying.
Silver surged 3.45% to $70.38 on June 15 after the US Iran peace deal reopened the Strait of Hormuz, but the rally was built on falling oil and fading rate hike fears, not safe haven buying. The Fed’s June 17 hold—paired with a higher 2026 rate projection of 3.8% and a new data dependent framework—sent silver plunging 2.69% in a single session, eventually hitting a cycle low of $61.59.
Industrial headwinds are piling up: solar manufacturers are aggressively cutting silver use in panels, total industrial demand is forecast to fall to a four year low, and Chinese demand remains weak.