At the time of the report, ETH was trading near $1,880 and holding above roughly $1,860, identified as nearby support. The key resistance zone was $1,920–$1,960.
That creates a straightforward technical test:
A move through the resistance zone would show that buyers are overcoming the immediate technical barrier. It would still need to hold above that area to provide stronger evidence that the network-growth narrative is translating into price momentum.
Not reliably. In September 2024, Ethereum recorded a four-month high in network growth after 126,210 new wallets were created on a typically quiet Sunday. ETH nevertheless remained below $2,300 and was described as being under selling pressure.
A later record one-day increase of 393,600 new wallets also produced only a muted immediate reaction in ETH, creating a divergence between network growth and price performance.
These examples do not prove that wallet growth is bearish. They show instead that the relationship is conditional: new addresses can indicate expanding participation, but price also depends on whether that participation represents actual buying, how much capital is involved, and whether the broader market is willing to absorb selling pressure.
The most convincing follow-through would be a combination of factors rather than a single headline metric:
For now, Ethereum’s 75% increase in daily new addresses is potentially constructive, but it is not a standalone price forecast. The clearest conclusion from the available evidence is that network participation has accelerated while the market still needs confirmation that the growth is translating into durable demand for ETH.