Diplomatic optimism faded as the week progressed. A parliamentary committee in Iran began reviewing a draft bill that would bar U.S., Israeli, and other "hostile" vessels from transiting the Strait of Hormuz and impose fines of up to 20% of a ship's cargo value for violations . The bill, titled the "Strategic Action for the Security and Sustainable Development of the Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf," signals Tehran is demanding compensation for war damage before reopening the waterway
.
Fee disputes and U.S. sanctions concerns further complicated a proposed interim deal between Iran and Oman, leaving markets uncertain about what would clinch an agreement . This uncertainty drove a mid-week rebound as investors reassessed the obstacles.
The U.S. July jobs report showed a loss of 23,000 jobs versus expectations for a gain of 85,000. This significantly reduced the likelihood of a Federal Reserve rate hike, which provided a floor under oil prices by weakening the dollar and supporting demand expectations.
Beyond the Hormuz negotiations, wider regional tensions continued to escalate. Saudi Arabia was reportedly expecting imminent coordinated attacks from Iraqi militias and Houthi forces, and Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey signed a joint defense agreement, signaling a wider regional military alignment.
The Strait of Hormuz normally handles about a fifth of global oil and LNG shipments . Until a credible deal is reached—or the conflict clearly de-escalates—a substantial disruption premium will persist in prices. The market swung from selling off on diplomatic hopes (Monday) to reassessing obstacles and hawkish Iranian legislation (mid-week), while the weak jobs report prevented an even larger collapse. The result is a 9%+ weekly loss on both benchmarks, but with prices still volatile as the fundamental supply risk remains unresolved.