BMW’s performance in China, its single most important market, deteriorated faster than expected through the second quarter of 2026 . The negative trend has hit non-electric vehicles especially hard, according to the company’s official statement, and the China Passenger Car Association has repeatedly cut its full-year market forecast . The pain is not just cyclical; it is structural. Chinese consumers are increasingly choosing domestic brands—BYD, Xiaomi, Huawei, and others—which offer affordable vehicles packed with the latest software and electrification features . This intensifying competition has pressured both prices and volumes for legacy luxury players. BMW’s first-quarter 2026 automaking EBIT margin had already slipped to 5%, down from 6.9% a year earlier, largely due to China . By June, the situation was severe enough for BMW to plan an extended cost-cutting program .
For the full year, BMW now expects core automotive deliveries to fall slightly, a reversal from its previous target of holding sales at 2025 levels, when the group delivered roughly 2.464 million vehicles . China sales had already dropped 12.5% in 2025, though gains in other regions helped offset that decline . In 2026, the China slump is deepening rather than stabilizing, and BMW no longer expects those regional offsets to be enough .
The Iran conflict, which escalated significantly in early 2026 with US and Israeli military action and the near-closure of the Strait of Hormuz, has injected a separate and dangerous cost pressure into BMW’s European production base. The strait is a chokepoint for roughly 20% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas supply . Its disruption has sent energy prices climbing and made basic chemical inputs—such as ethylene and propylene, essential for plastics and paint—increasingly uncompetitive to produce in Europe .
Chemical giant BASF warned in early June that shortages of key materials are becoming more likely and could halt tightly run automotive supply chains. CEO Markus Kamieth cited the risk of “supply-chain disruption from the US-Israeli conflict with Iran” darkening the outlook for the auto sector and the broader economy . The war is already contributing to scarcity of inputs like sulfur and helium .
These supply-chain threats hit BMW directly. Higher raw-material and energy costs compress margins from the cost side, even as falling China demand squeezes them from the revenue side. German industrial production had already contracted in March as energy prices jumped at the outbreak of the war, and factory orders fell faster than expected in April, with the economy ministry warning that “rising prices for energy and raw materials, together with significantly heightened geopolitical uncertainty, are resulting in weaker demand” .
The broader auto industry is absorbing the same twin shocks. In May, S&P Global Ratings cut its global auto sales forecast, citing a "double whammy" of weakening China demand and rising energy costs tied to the Middle East war . The firm projected global light vehicle sales would drop below 90 million units annually from 2026 to 2028, with US sales already down 6.7% in the first four months of 2026 . S&P Global Mobility’s May production outlook reduced Greater China’s light vehicle forecast by 197,000 units for 2026 and trimmed Europe’s outlook by another 67,000 units .
PwC’s Autofacts market update had already pointed to global sales falling behind prior-year levels after a post-Lunar New Year decline in China, with medium-term forecasts anticipating stagnation due to high commodity prices and the Iran conflict . The Iran war has also pushed up Brent crude and European natural gas prices, leading S&P Global Mobility to warn of “immediate disruptions in the supply chain and escalated costs” for automakers, with the length of the conflict being the critical variable .
BMW’s acute vulnerability comes from its exposure to the two most disrupted theaters simultaneously: China’s demand environment and Europe’s fragile, energy-dependent industrial supply base. While rivals face similar pressures, BMW’s margin warning was the most drastic among major German automakers, reflecting its particular sensitivity to both top-line weakness in China and bottom-line cost inflation from energy-driven supply chain disruptions .
These forces are mutually reinforcing in a way that makes them more damaging together than they would be separately. Weaker China demand forces BMW to compete harder on price, which depresses revenue per vehicle. At the same time, rising energy and petrochemical costs from the Iran war increase the cost of every vehicle produced in Europe, where BMW builds many of its highest-margin models. The result is a profit margin squeeze from both sides—an effect BMW’s own figures capture starkly: EBIT margin guidance halved from 4–6% to 1–3% in a single revision .
The Iran war also worsens the China problem indirectly. Higher global oil prices—which could reach $100 per barrel in a protracted closure scenario—dampen consumer confidence and purchasing power in price-sensitive markets . BMW’s official guidance revision noted that the war had "hit consumer sentiment and raised energy costs" . With the global auto industry facing what S&P Global describes as a period of “cautious stability” being replaced by clear downward revisions across all major production regions, BMW’s warning may be a loud signal of a broader downturn rather than an isolated alarm .