AkzoNobel shares fell 19% after Sherwin Williams and Nippon Paint withdrew their joint €12.5 billion ($14.5 billion) cash acquisition offer, which the Dutch paint maker's board had rejected. The stock gave back almost all the gains from the previous week, returning near its pre offer level as a buyout premium no lon...

Create a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: What caused AkzoNobel's shares to plunge over 20% in early trading on Wednesday, following the collapse of a joint takeover bid by Sherwin-W. Article summary: Here is the full picture based on today's events.. Topic tags: general, general web. Reference image context from search candidates: Reference image 1: visual subject "* [Products](https://www.tradingview.com/chart/). * [Community](https://www.tradingview.com/ideas/). * [Markets](https://www.tradingview.com/markets/). * [Brokers](https://" source context "AkzoNobel jumps after rejecting takeover bid from Nippon Paint and ..." Reference image 2: visual subject "AkzoNobel rejects joint $14.53B takeover bid from Nippon Paint and Sherwin-Williams. AkzoNobel has rejected a joint 12.49 billion-euro ($14.53 billion) all-cash takeover proposal f" source context "AkzoNo
AkzoNobel’s stock suffered one of its worst single-day drops on Wednesday, tumbling as much as 19% in early European trading after a high-stakes takeover offer from two of its biggest rivals formally collapsed . The sudden retreat in share price effectively erased a rally from the week prior, leaving the company’s pending merger with Axalta Coating Systems as the only game in town.
The sharp move downward followed an official announcement by Nippon Paint and Sherwin-Williams that they were no longer pursuing a joint acquisition of the Dulux maker . The consortium’s decision closed the door on a non-binding, all-cash bid of €73 per share that had valued the company at approximately €12.49 billion ($14.53 billion)
.
The takeover saga effectively began and ended in little more than a week. AkzoNobel publicly disclosed on May 27 that its boards had rejected a formal proposal from Nippon Paint and Sherwin-Williams, which was received on April 29 and turned down on May 1 . The board deemed the €73-per-share bid undervalued the company and said it lacked deal certainty, particularly regarding regulatory approvals and because the proposal would have split AkzoNobel’s businesses between the two suitors
.
When news of the unsolicited bid first broke, traders bid the stock up as much as 21% on the prospect of a successful takeover or a potential bidding war . The €73 offer represented a 39% premium over the prior closing price of €52.52 per share
.
Rather than triggering a bidding contest, the board’s swift rejection left the suitors with little room to maneuver. On June 3, Nippon Paint and Sherwin-Williams confirmed they were halting their efforts, citing AkzoNobel’s refusal to engage . The stock fell to roughly €53.74 per share, wiping out almost the entire speculative premium
.
Throughout the takeover drama, AkzoNobel’s management and supervisory boards never wavered from their preferred strategy: the all-stock merger of equals with Axalta Coating Systems, originally announced in November 2025 . Even after receiving the €73-per-share cash offer, the board unanimously reaffirmed its recommendation of the Axalta deal
.
The terms of that transaction remain unchanged. The combined company will have an enterprise value of approximately $25 billion, with projected annual revenues of about $17 billion and $1.5 billion in adjusted free cash flow . The merger is expected to generate roughly $600 million in pre-tax run-rate cost synergies, with 90% of those savings anticipated within three years of closing
.
Under the agreement, Axalta shareholders will receive 0.6539 shares of AkzoNobel for each Axalta share they own . AkzoNobel shareholders will also receive a special cash dividend of up to €2.5 billion minus any regular dividends paid before completion, and will own roughly 55% of the new entity
.
Timing remains on a long runway. The transaction must clear shareholder votes at both companies, which are expected in the second half of 2026, consistent with the previously outlined early July target . A successful close is projected for late 2026 to early 2027, subject to regulatory approvals and the listing of the combined company’s shares on the New York Stock Exchange
.
The stock’s sharp reversal tells a clear story: without a competing cash bid on the table, AkzoNobel’s near-term value reverts to its pre-offer baseline. The market had temporarily priced in a 39% cash premium that no longer exists. Now, investors are left to evaluate the long-term value creation promised by the Axalta merger—a deal focused on scale, cost synergies, and a combined portfolio across decorative paints, performance coatings, and automotive finishes .
Studio Global AI
Use this topic as a starting point for a fresh source-backed answer, then compare citations before you share it.
AkzoNobel shares fell 19% after Sherwin Williams and Nippon Paint withdrew their joint €12.5 billion ($14.5 billion) cash acquisition offer, which the Dutch paint maker's board had rejected.
AkzoNobel shares fell 19% after Sherwin Williams and Nippon Paint withdrew their joint €12.5 billion ($14.5 billion) cash acquisition offer, which the Dutch paint maker's board had rejected. The stock gave back almost all the gains from the previous week, returning near its pre offer level as a buyout premium no longer exists.
The board unanimously reaffirmed its commitment to the all stock merger with Axalta, a deal valued at $25 billion aimed at generating $600 million in annual synergies.