The proceeds are funding a strategic pivot away from pure Bitcoin mining toward AI and high-performance computing (HPC) infrastructure. MARA acquired a $1.5 billion Ohio power plant to build AI data centers, confirmed 15% layoffs, and signaled further Bitcoin sales may be needed to finance the deal . After the quarter ended, MARA also pledged 18,750 BTC as collateral to secure $600 million in additional borrowing capacity
.
MARA's Q2 2026 results underscore the financial pressure driving these moves. The company posted a $611.3 million net loss, with $343 million from unrealized mark-to-market losses on digital assets as Bitcoin's average price fell 28% year-over-year . Revenue dropped 27% to $174.9 million, and adjusted EBITDA was negative $360.9 million
.
Bhutan's Royal Government moved 434.87 BTC (worth ~$27.93 million) off its books on August 7, ending a month-long pause in outflows . This continues a steady sovereign sell-off that has reduced Bhutan's holdings from roughly 13,000 BTC in mid-2025 to about 3,100 BTC as of mid-2026 — a cumulative drawdown on-chain analysts value at roughly $1 billion
.
The sales are linked to funding Bhutan's Gelephu Mindfulness City (GMC), a special administrative region in southern Bhutan. In December 2025, Bhutan announced a Bitcoin Development Pledge committing up to 10,000 BTC (~$1 billion at the time) to back GMC's development . However, rather than simply liquidating, Bhutan is operationalizing its treasury: on August 4, GMC awarded 3iQ Corp. a mandate to manage part of its Bitcoin treasury, aiming to generate returns through a low-risk, market-neutral investment approach
.
Bhutan officials have denied the country sold nearly $1 billion, calling the drawdown a "hold-and-optimize" treasury management strategy rather than a pessimistic dump . Arkham Intelligence estimated that at the selling pace observed in mid-2026 — roughly $50 million per month — Bhutan could exhaust its remaining reserves before the end of September
.
Combined, the two transactions represent roughly $74 million — a tiny fraction of daily BTC spot volume, which routinely exceeds $10-20 billion. The sales were absorbed without visible price impact.
More importantly, they illustrate the operational reality that institutional Bitcoin holders — whether a Nasdaq-listed corporation or a sovereign state — cannot simply HODL indefinitely. Both face real-world funding constraints:
The absence of market panic suggests that, so far, the market has priced in the likelihood that large holders will occasionally need to sell. The risk not yet tested is what happens if a very large holder is forced to sell into a thin or declining market.