Vivek Raman, CEO of Etherealize, calls Wall Street's resurgence of private, permissioned blockchains 'consortium chain 2.0' and a 'race to the bottom' — arguing that these gated networks fragment liquidity, don't inte... He proposes building on public Ethereum as the base layer (like HTTP) with permissioning, privac...
Research answer

Create a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: What are the main arguments Vivek Raman, CEO of Etherealize, makes against Wall Street's growing use of private blockchains, what alternativ. Article summary: Here is a concise breakdown of Vivek Raman's position, his proposed alternative, and the broader context.. Topic tags: general, general web, user generated. Style: premium digital editorial illustration, source-backed research mood, clean composition, high detail, modern web publication hero. Use reference image context only for broad subject, composition, and topical grounding; do not copy the exact image. Avoid: logos, brand marks, copyrighted characters, real person likenesses, fake screenshots, UI text, readable text, watermarks, charts with fake numbers, clickbait thumbnails, icons, and tiny thumbnail layouts. Make it useful as an illustrative visual, not
Wall Street is rediscovering private blockchains — and Vivek Raman, CEO of Etherealize, has a blunt warning: it's a mistake that will fragment liquidity, recreate walled gardens, and repeat the failures of earlier consortium efforts. He argues that the only durable path forward is an open, public blockchain like Ethereum as the base layer, with permissioning and privacy added on top.
Raman describes the resurgence of permissioned, closed-loop networks as "consortium chain 2.0" — and calls it a "race to the bottom." His critique rests on three main points:
Fragmented liquidity. Private silos split capital across incompatible networks. Instead of pooling liquidity in a single, globally accessible market, each consortium chain becomes its own isolated pool — defeating the efficiency gains blockchain was designed to deliver .
Recreating isolated systems. These gated chains don't communicate with one another. Raman argues this reverts the industry to the same walled-garden problem blockchain was supposed to eliminate: proprietary networks that don't interoperate .
Historical precedent. Raman points to earlier failed consortium efforts — R3 (which saw Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and others withdraw) and Hyperledger — as evidence that closed networks rarely achieve lasting traction .
"This is going to end up being a race to the bottom for consortium chains. You're going to have consortium chains versus consortium chains." — Vivek Raman
Raman's proposed alternative is clear: use an open, public blockchain as the base layer, and add permissioning, privacy, and access control at higher layers — not inside the network itself .
His central analogy compares Ethereum's mainnet to HTTP, the transparent, permissionless foundation of the internet. Institutions can then build permissioned, privacy-enabled features at the application layer or on L2s — akin to HTTPS sitting securely on top of HTTP .
"We strongly believe, and always have done, that you need a global, open, permissionless infrastructure as the base layer. Then you can build all the permissioning on top of it." — Vivek Raman
This is the architectural principle behind Etherealize, the firm Raman co-founded and leads, which is laser-focused on bridging traditional finance to Ethereum. The company is backed by Vitalik Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation .
This debate sits at the center of a live strategic fork in institutional adoption:
The private-chain wave. Major financial firms are building or joining gated networks, including Digital Asset's Canton Network, Circle's ARC, and Stripe's Tempo. These consortium chains offer built-in privacy and reduced counterparty risk — attributes that mainstream finance finds immediately attractive .
The public-chain counter-current. BlackRock and other large asset managers are simultaneously expanding tokenized products on Ethereum, signaling real demand for an open settlement layer that can serve as a neutral, globally accessible backbone .
The core question. Which model will win? Raman's position is that the market will ultimately value decentralization and interoperability — the properties that make public blockchains useful. But the consortium approach prioritizes corporate control and curated privacy. MIT's Christian Catalini observed that the rapid uptake of gated systems suggests many institutions may not prioritize the original blockchain ethos .
Raman's argument is that public chains like Ethereum have matured enough to serve as that neutral backbone — and that institutional requirements for privacy and access control can be met through layered architecture rather than closed networks .
Studio Global AI
This page includes a source-backed answer you can continue inside Studio Global.
Vivek Raman, CEO of Etherealize, calls Wall Street's resurgence of private, permissioned blockchains 'consortium chain 2.0' and a 'race to the bottom' — arguing that these gated networks fragment liquidity, don't inte...
Vivek Raman, CEO of Etherealize, calls Wall Street's resurgence of private, permissioned blockchains 'consortium chain 2.0' and a 'race to the bottom' — arguing that these gated networks fragment liquidity, don't inte... He proposes building on public Ethereum as the base layer (like HTTP) with permissioning, privacy, and access control added at the application layer or on L2s (like HTTPS), rather than baking restrictions into the net...
This debate sits at the center of institutional adoption: BlackRock runs tokenized products on Ethereum, while firms like Digital Asset, Circle, and Stripe build consortium chains — raising the core question of whethe...