The claim that “no one else” knew or thought Earth was unsupported is not historically reliable. Anaximander of Miletus, a Greek thinker associated with the early 6th century BCE, is a key counterexample [3].

Create a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: Stimmt es, dass sonst niemand wusste, dass die Erde nicht an etwas hängt?. Article summary: Es stimmt nicht, dass „sonst niemand“ wusste oder dachte, dass die Erde nicht auf etwas ruht.. Topic tags: general web, video, microsoft, education. Reference image context from search candidates: Reference image 1: visual subject "Dieses Buch bringt im wesentlichen den Inhalt der. Gifford::Vorträge, die ich von Januar bis März 1927 an der. Universität Edinburg gehalten habe." source context "Das Weltbild der Physik und ein Versuch seiner philosophischen Deutung: The nature of the physical world | Springer Natu" Reference image 2: visual subject "Dieses Buch bringt im wesentlichen den Inhalt der. Gifford::Vorträge, die ich von Januar bis März 1927 an der. Universität Edinburg gehalten habe." source context "Das Weltbild der Ph
No. The claim that “no one else” knew—or even thought—that Earth was not resting on something is too strong.
A major counterexample is Anaximander of Miletus, a Greek thinker generally placed in the early 6th century BCE . Ancient testimony credits him with a striking cosmological idea: Earth is in the centre of the cosmos and is not supported by anything
.
According to reports discussed in the ancient tradition, Anaximander explained Earth’s stillness by saying it was equally distant from everything around it. Because there was no privileged direction for it to move, it needed no physical prop or foundation .
That does not mean Anaximander had modern astronomy. He did not picture Earth as a modern spherical planet orbiting the Sun. His model is commonly described as placing a cylindrical Earth at the centre of his cosmos .
But for this specific question, that distinction matters: the issue is not whether Anaximander was scientifically correct by today’s standards. The issue is whether the idea of an unsupported Earth was unique to Job or the Bible. Anaximander’s model shows that it was not .
So the short answer is: the verse in Job is notable, but the exclusivity claim is false. At least one well-attested ancient Greek model also described Earth as unsupported .
Studio Global AI
Use this topic as a starting point for a fresh source-backed answer, then compare citations before you share it.
The claim that “no one else” knew or thought Earth was unsupported is not historically reliable.
The claim that “no one else” knew or thought Earth was unsupported is not historically reliable. Anaximander of Miletus, a Greek thinker associated with the early 6th century BCE, is a key counterexample [3].
Ancient reports credit Anaximander with the view that Earth was suspended or floating free, not resting on a support [1][2][4].