Klein's more measured tone is not the only perspective from inside SAP. The company's CFO, Dominik Asam, has been blunter about the impact on jobs. In a September 2025 interview, Asam acknowledged that there will be a need for "fewer engineers to deliver the same—or even greater—output" due to AI-driven automation . He warned that if workforce reduction is handled poorly, it could be a "catastrophe" for the business
. This internal acknowledgment from SAP's own leadership underscores the tension between productivity gains and employment.
The most aggressive predictions are coming from outside SAP. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said at the World Economic Forum in Davos in January 2026 that AI could handle "most, maybe all" of what software engineers currently do within 6 to 12 months . He cited engineers at Anthropic who "don't write any code anymore; I just let the model write the code, I edit it"
.
Boris Cherny, the creator of Anthropic's coding tool Claude Code, went even further. He confirmed in early 2026 that 100% of his own code is now AI-written . He also warned that the traditional entry-level "software engineer" role could effectively disappear by the end of 2026
. The tool itself, Claude Code, has been described by a senior Google engineer as capable of recreating a year's worth of work in a single hour
.
The shift is not just talk. Spotify's co-CEO Gustav Söderström revealed in an earnings call that the company's best senior engineers have not written a single line of code since December 2025. Instead, almost all coding is handled by an internal AI system called "Honk," which is built on Anthropic's Claude Code . At Google, leadership said in October 2025 that AI agents are writing half of all new code
.
A broader Fortune article from February 2026 reported that the launch of powerful new coding models from OpenAI (GPT-5.3-Codex) and Anthropic (Claude Opus 4.6) has led developers to claim they have "abandoned traditional programming" .
The macroeconomic picture adds nuance to the corporate announcements. The February 21, 2026 Fortune article ("You have 18 months to figure out your office job") cites Stanford economist Erik Brynjolfsson, who notes that U.S. productivity lifted to 2.7% in 2025, compared to a 1.4% average over the prior decade, suggesting that AI-driven displacement may be real . However, the same article notes that actual AI adoption across the economy is still a fraction of what is theoretically possible, and that the U.S. economy "largely flatlined in job production"
.
Anthropic's own 2026 Economic Index, which analyzed 2 million Claude AI interactions, found that AI currently "augments jobs by handling routine tasks" rather than replacing entire roles . But another study cited in Fortune found that 75% of tasks for computer programmers could theoretically be covered by AI
.
Not everyone is convinced of an immediate coding apocalypse. Tanmai Gopal, CEO of PromptQL, argued in Fortune that the doomsday predictions are "Silicon Valley self-projection": the tech community is "feeling the awesomeness of this AI" but "projecting that into domains that we don't actually understand" .
Meanwhile, SAP is not standing still. The company is embedding AI into its core products, launching its Business AI Platform at Sapphire 2026, and reorganizing its board to focus on AI . Its strategy is to "enhance critical business workflows, so that humans and AI work together"
. Klein remains confident that SAP's SaaS and PaaS business will survive because the enterprise context — the "brain" — is what makes AI agents useful
.