IP addresses are personal data under GDPR . Because Google is changing the processing purpose from technical delivery to advertising measurement and personalization, the use now requires affirmative user consent in the affected regions
. Advertisers must ensure compliance with Google's EU User Consent Policy (EU UCP)
. If a user does not consent, Google cannot use their IP address for these advertising purposes.
Publishers and advertisers need to update their consent flows and disclosures where necessary to explain that IP addresses may be used for ad measurement and personalization . Key compliance requirements include:
ad_storage the sole authority over advertising data collection for Google Ads accounts linked to a site The available sources do not provide detailed specifics on the exact privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) Google cites as safeguards for this change. What is documented is the role of consent-driven controls and the June 2026 change making ad_storage the key control for advertising data collection in linked Google Ads accounts . However, the supplied reporting on this specific IP-address announcement does not detail a named set of PETs, such as differential privacy, k-anonymity, or on-device processing.
Google's IP address repurposing arrives in a landscape of regulatory friction.
Google's fingerprinting reversal — In December 2024, Google changed its advertising rules to allow fingerprinting, a technique that lets advertisers gather extensive data about users, including IP addresses and device-specific information . Privacy advocates criticized the move as a disregard for user privacy
.
ICO criticism — The UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) criticized Google's fingerprinting policy direction, calling it irresponsible and noting that fingerprinting can undermine user control and transparency .
ICO's May 2026 advice on consent rules — On May 18, 2026, the ICO published advice to the UK government on potential amendments to PECR's storage-and-access-technology consent requirements . The ICO recommended a risk-based framework under which certain low-risk online advertising activities could operate without user consent, while higher-risk tracking would be treated differently
. The ICO also emphasized that nothing has changed legally for now—existing consent rules remain in effect unless and until the law is amended
.
Tension — Google is moving ahead with IP-address-based ad measurement and personalization while the ICO has suggested that some lower-risk advertising activities might not require consent in the future, but current rules have not changed .
Advertisers bear the immediate compliance burden because Google has notified advertisers that it will begin using IP addresses for ad measurement and personalization in the EEA, UK, and Switzerland, and reporting says consent is required for this use . That means:
The core takeaway: Google is changing the purpose for which it uses IP addresses in the EU, UK, and Switzerland from technical ad delivery toward advertising measurement and personalization, and reporting says that this requires affirmative user consent in the affected regions . Until a Google-controlled choice mechanism is clearly deployed and applicable, the practical compliance obligation sits with advertisers and publishers managing their own consent flows
.
Comments
0 comments