How Netanyahu's July 2026 Call with Rubio Plugged Into the US Campaign to Dismantle the ICC

The ICC Assembly of States Parties Vote to Remove Karim Khan (July 24, 2026)

On July 24, 2026, the ICC's Assembly of States Parties (ASP) voted 82–13 (with 15 abstentions) to remove chief prosecutor Karim Khan from office for sexual misconduct against a junior staff member . The vote followed an 18-month investigation and a suspension in June 2026 . Khan has denied wrongdoing and called the process unlawful . This removal was a severe institutional blow to the ICC, occurring alongside the broader US campaign.

The Broader US Campaign to Dismantle the ICC

On July 13, 2026, Secretary Rubio launched a "sweeping campaign to dismantle the threat posed by the International Criminal Court to U.S. sovereignty," describing it as a "whole-of-government response to systematically disable the ICC's ability to operate" . Rubio published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal arguing the ICC threatens American sovereignty . The US has ramped up pressure on ICC staff, threatened visa revocations, sanctions, and urged allies to turn their backs on the court . Amnesty International called the campaign "reprehensible" , and the ICC itself has resisted the pressure .

Venezuela's Withdrawal from the ICC (July 24, 2026)

On the same day as the Khan vote, Venezuela formally notified the UN of its "irrevocable" withdrawal from the ICC, citing "geographical bias" against the Global South . The US State Department welcomed the decision, noting that the new Venezuelan interim government has partnered with "American-led efforts to dismantle the corrupt and worthless ICC" . The UN human rights mission criticized the withdrawal as undermining accountability for serious crimes .

Legal Status of the ICC Arrest Warrant Against Netanyahu

The arrest warrant issued by the ICC against Netanyahu was not directly addressed in the search results gathered. However, the following is relevant context:

• Karim Khan was the prosecutor who had sought the warrant. His removal does not automatically invalidate the warrant, as warrants are issued by ICC judges (Pre-Trial Chamber), not by the prosecutor alone.
• The US campaign to dismantle the ICC and Venezuela's withdrawal do not change the warrant's legal standing vis-à-vis the remaining 125 state parties. Israel is not an ICC member, so the warrant primarily creates legal obligations for member states to arrest Netanyahu if he travels to their territory.
• Key caveat: No official ICC statement or judicial ruling on the warrant's status post-Khan was found in the available sources. The warrant remains legally in place unless formally withdrawn or quashed by the court.

Summary of Connections

Bottom line: The July 2026 Netanyahu–Rubio call represents high-level coordination between Israel and the US at a moment of maximum institutional pressure on the ICC — the chief prosecutor was removed days earlier, Venezuela announced withdrawal the same day, and the US campaign to dismantle the court was in full swing. The ICC arrest warrant against Netanyahu was issued by judges rather than solely by the prosecutor, so Khan's removal does not automatically nullify it, but the overall context severely undermines the court's enforcement capacity and political standing regarding the warrant.