Grayscale's Zach Pandl argues Bitcoin has already bottomed near $65K–$70K, driven by macroeconomic forces rather than the traditional four year halving cycle. Mining CEO Jiang Zhuoer predicts a final bottom at $42K–$44,000 between October and December 2026, based on the four year cycle and Strategy's falling mNAV ra...

Create a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: Search & fact-check with cited sources for What is Grayscale's view on whether Bitcoin has already bottomed in its current bear market, what. Article summary: ## Grayscale's View on Bitcoin Bottoming. Topic tags: general, general web, user generated. Style: premium digital editorial illustration, source-backed research mood, clean composition, high detail, modern web publication hero. Use reference image context only for broad subject, composition, and topical grounding; do not copy the exact image. Avoid: logos, brand marks, copyrighted characters, real person likenesses, fake screenshots, UI text, readable text, watermarks, charts with fake numbers, clickbait thumbnails, icons, and tiny thumbnail layouts. Make it useful as an illustrative visual, not as factual evidence.
Bitcoin's price direction in mid-2026 is the subject of a sharp disagreement between two well-known voices in crypto. Grayscale's head of research, Zach Pandl, has argued that Bitcoin may have already bottomed in the current bear market — significantly earlier than the traditional four-year halving cycle would predict . On the other side, Jiang Zhuoer, founder of mining pool BTC.TOP, forecasts a final bottom of $42,000–$44,000 between October and December 2026
. Understanding the logic behind each view is important for any investor trying to navigate this market.
Pandl frames the current downturn through two competing lenses :
His core thesis is simple: Bitcoin is a macro asset that trades alongside currencies, commodities, and equities . The key variable is whether the Fed hikes rates further or holds steady. Pandl has stated explicitly that if the Fed does not raise rates, Bitcoin may have already bottomed, breaking the traditional four-year cycle framework
. He points to the July 28–29 FOMC meeting as the next real catalyst for Bitcoin's direction
.
Pandl also notes the current bear market is driven by macroeconomic conditions — specifically elevated inflation (4.1% in June) and oil price spikes from geopolitical conflict — not by exchange collapses or crypto-native crises that marked previous bear cycles . This time is different, he argues, because Bitcoin ETFs, a pro-crypto political shift in the U.S., and global central bank easing have fundamentally changed the asset's pricing dynamics
.
Jiang Zhuoer bases his forecast on historical four-year cycle patterns and a technical signal from Strategy's (formerly MicroStrategy) market-to-net-asset-value (mNAV) ratio . At the time of his prediction, mNAV had fallen to 0.72, approaching the 0.7 level seen at the May 2022 cycle low
.
Jiang argues that an mNAV bottom usually precedes Bitcoin's price bottom by about six months. Combined with the four-year cycle model — which he likens to a bouncing ball losing height — his framework points to a low around October 31, 2026, near $44,016 . He revised the time frame to October–December 2026, with a price range of $42,000–$44,000
. His $42,000–$44,000 target is notably close to Arthur Hayes' recent $40,000 bottom call
.
| Dimension | Grayscale (Pandl) | Jiang Zhuoer (BTC.TOP) |
|---|---|---|
| Bottom timing | Already in (or near); may have bottomed in $65K–$70K range | Q4 2026 (October–December) |
| Price target | ~$65,000–$70,000 (bottom already in) | $42,000–$44,000 |
| Reasoning framework | Macroeconomic (Fed policy, real rates, growth) | Four-year halving cycle + Strategy (MSTR) mNAV metric |
| Key indicator | Fed's rate decisions; July 28–29 FOMC meeting | Strategy's mNAV falling toward 0.7 (now 0.72) |
| Outlook | Bullish/moderate — structurally bullish long-term, mid-cycle correction | Bearish — another leg down still ahead |
The fundamental disagreement comes down to whether Bitcoin has "graduated" from its cycle-based adolescence. Pandl argues that institutional adoption via Bitcoin ETFs, a pro-crypto U.S. political shift, and global central bank easing have fundamentally changed Bitcoin's pricing dynamics, making it a mature macro asset that responds to the Fed, not the miner's calendar . Jiang Zhuoer's model assumes the same cycle mechanics that governed past bear markets still apply, and that the macroeconomic "noise" is temporary within a longer structural downtrend that has not yet reached its historical low
.
Both views come with caveats. Pandl acknowledges that the traditional cycle framework still "implies a longer bear market" and leaves room for further downside if the Fed surprises with a hike . Jiang himself notes that his model has historically performed better on timing than on exact price
. The next major catalysts — the FOMC decision on July 28–29 and the progress of the CLARITY Act in the U.S. Senate — could tip the scales one way or the other
.
Studio Global AI
Use this topic as a starting point for a fresh source-backed answer, then compare citations before you share it.
Grayscale's Zach Pandl argues Bitcoin has already bottomed near $65K–$70K, driven by macroeconomic forces rather than the traditional four year halving cycle.
Grayscale's Zach Pandl argues Bitcoin has already bottomed near $65K–$70K, driven by macroeconomic forces rather than the traditional four year halving cycle. Mining CEO Jiang Zhuoer predicts a final bottom at $42K–$44,000 between October and December 2026, based on the four year cycle and Strategy's falling mNAV ratio.
The core disagreement: Has Bitcoin 'graduated' from its cycle based adolescence into a mature macro asset, or are old cycle mechanics still in control?