| Specification | SXQ128 | SXQ512 |
|---|---|---|
| Physical qubits | 128 | 512 |
| Entangled qubits per core | 8 | 16 |
| Processor cores | 16 (multi-core architecture) | 32 (multi-core architecture) |
| Single-gate fidelity | Up to 99.92% (<1 error per 1,000 ops) | Same |
| Qubit conversion yield | >85% (via sulfur co-implantation) | Same |
| Operating temperature | Room temp (18–27 °C / 293 K) | Same |
| Form factor | Standard server rack, standard AC outlet | Same |
| Energy efficiency | 6–10× better than GPU clusters | Same |
| Software stack | Qiskit, OpenQASM, proprietary QOS | Same |
The enabling manufacturing breakthrough is SAXON Q's proprietary sulfur co-implantation process, protected by over 220 patents and applications . While traditional NV-center creation methods achieve conversion yields of only 1–10%, this process raises the yield to greater than 85%, allowing for the dense, high-accuracy qubit arrays that make the 128- and 512-qubit systems possible
. The diamond chips themselves are fabricated on standard CMOS semiconductor lines with sub-5 nm qubit placement precision
.
SAXON Q is already shipping systems to research institutions, building credibility for its commercial launch :
Existing deployments: Earlier-generation SAXON Q systems are in active use at the DLR (German Aerospace Center) and Fraunhofer IWU . Fraunhofer IWU has stated that an earlier system "exceeded the gate fidelity specifications we outlined in the tender"
.
SXQ128: Available to order now, with deliveries within approximately 3 months (expected late summer or fall 2026) .
SXQ512: Available for advance purchase; customer shipments are scheduled to begin in Q2 2027 .
Pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Each system is custom-built and configured to individual customer requirements .
SAXON Q is positioning these systems for near-term, Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) workloads. The multi-core architecture is designed to be modular, allowing organizations to start with an SXQ128 and scale by swapping diamond chips or adding cores . The targeted workloads include
:
While the announcement represents a genuine engineering milestone for NV-center quantum computing, several critical factors require scrutiny before interpreting these systems as ready for general-purpose quantum computing .
The 99.92% single-gate fidelity and >85% yield figures come from SAXON Q's own press materials and website, not from peer-reviewed, third-party benchmarking . Fraunhofer IWU's positive statement refers to a prior-generation system, not the new SXQ128 or SXQ512
. Independent benchmarks for the 512-qubit system are absent
.
The company has not published coherence times (T₁/T₂) or two-qubit gate fidelities . These are essential metrics for assessing the real computational power of a quantum processor. By comparison, competing superconducting qubit architectures have reported single-qubit fidelities of 99.94% and two-qubit gate errors below 1% as early as 2014, with coherence times extending to milliseconds
.
The SXQ128 and SXQ512 offer physical qubits. Error correction and the implementation of logical qubit architectures are on SAXON Q's roadmap, not yet delivered . Fault-tolerant quantum computing remains a future goal.
While the total qubit count is a milestone for NV-center systems, the per-core entanglement depth is modest. The SXQ128 provides only 8 fully entangled qubits per core across its 16 cores. This is low compared to trapped-ion or superconducting systems that routinely entangle 20 or more qubits in a single register .
The SXQ512 is 9+ months from delivery, essentially a pre-order today . SAXON Q is a relatively young startup (spun out of Universität Leipzig in 2021), and scalability to its roadmap target of 10,000+ qubits remains unproven in hardware
.
SAXON Q has solved two fundamental problems that have limited NV-center quantum computing for decades: manufacturing yield and room-temperature operation. The sulfur co-implantation process is a legitimate breakthrough . However, the SXQ128 and SXQ512 are best understood as the first commercially viable room-temperature quantum co-processors for near-term NISQ workloads, not as general-purpose, fault-tolerant quantum computers. The lack of independently verified benchmarks, undisclosed coherence times, and absence of demonstrated error correction mean a cautious, evidence-based approach is warranted before making procurement decisions
.