From the tournament's opening matches at the venue, the surface drew sharp criticism for being dry, rigid, and difficult to play on:
FIFA strongly pushed back. In multiple statements, the organization said all 16 tournament fields, including MetLife's temporary grass, were in "excellent" condition and met rigorous FIFA standards . FIFA emphasized that it had dedicated over five years to collaborative research, testing, and innovation with top turf specialists . Rather than acknowledging an installation problem, FIFA attributed player complaints to seasonal weather and summer heat .
The World Cup final pitted defending champions Argentina against Spain, the tournament's other dominant side. It was the highest-stakes test of the controversial surface:
The MetLife pitch controversy highlighted the persistent challenge of converting NFL stadiums — designed for artificial turf — into world-class soccer venues. With the most expensive tickets in World Cup history and two elite teams competing for the trophy, the July 19 final became a high-stakes referendum on whether temporary grass installations could meet the sport's highest standards.