The most powerful argument in Minter’s toolkit is central bank buying, which he calls the "structural bid" under the gold market. Key data points from his analysis:
Minter notes that the People’s Bank of China took advantage of the price decline to acquire an additional 15 tonnes of gold for its stockpile—a move he described as precisely the kind of dip-buying behavior that supports his thesis .
Minter acknowledges that gold ETF investors have been net sellers, basing their decisions on rising real interest rates . However, he highlights that ETF outflows have slowed to a trickle in recent weeks . His view is that even a slowdown in selling can meaningfully shift the supply-demand balance .
The broader market is watching this closely. Morgan Stanley has said that gold will struggle to reach $5,200/oz without strong ETF inflows , and a $1.1 billion inflow in late June snapped four straight weeks of redemptions . Minter's position is that once investors refocus on structural factors, ETF buying will resume .
Minter emphasizes that gold mine supply is structurally constrained in ways that support higher prices long-term:
This supply-demand imbalance—rising structural demand from central banks meeting flat-to-declining mine supply—underpins Minter’s bullish conviction even as prices correct.
Minter argues that the market has become overly fixated on hawkish Fed rhetoric while underestimating the supportive structural forces at work . His reasoning:
Minter sees gold near $4,000 as offering a favorable entry point because the pullback is technical and sentiment-driven, central banks are poised to buy more aggressively on dips, mine supply is barely growing, and the market is overreacting to hawkish Fed rhetoric that may not translate into actual rate hikes . He is not alone in this view: Goldman Sachs continues to forecast gold reaching $4,900 per ounce by the end of 2026, citing the same structural drivers of sovereign reserve diversification and central bank demand .