MIM plunged to approximately $0.48–$0.50, a drop of more than 50% from its $1 target . Blockchain security firm PeckShield recorded a 37.39% single-day drop to $0.4942 on June 25
.
The depeg created a natural arbitrage window for borrowers. Since MIM traded at roughly $0.49 on the open market, anyone with a MIM loan from a Cauldron could buy MIM cheaply on an exchange and repay their 1:1 debt at a substantial discount . The rate hikes were designed to accelerate this behavior: higher borrowing costs make holding MIM debt more expensive, pushing borrowers to close positions sooner
.
By late Wednesday (June 25), MIM had recovered to approximately $0.95, narrowing the depeg significantly after the emergency measures took effect . Multiple sources noted the rapid bounce as evidence that the rate-hike mechanism was working
.
The episode reignited questions about the resilience of collateral-backed algorithmic stablecoins operating with limited market depth . Unlike fully fiat-backed stablecoins (e.g., USDC, USDT), MIM is minted against interest-bearing crypto collateral in CDP-style vaults, making it vulnerable to liquidity crunches when incentives shift or large positions unwind
. The failure of a $100K direct liquidity injection to stabilize MIM at roughly $0.82 underscored just how thin the MIM Curve pool had become
.
As one analysis noted, the episode was "the latest stress test for a smaller DeFi stablecoin" — one in which the protocol bet that shrinking the circulating supply could drag the token back toward $1 .
The emergency measures remain in effect indefinitely until those goals are met.