The same cited listing does not include a Gemini 3.5 entry . For release-date questions, that absence matters: screenshots, anonymous benchmarks, and social posts can suggest internal testing, but they do not establish public availability.
The rumor cycle has two main threads.
First, several posts claim Google is testing a next-generation model called Gemini 3.5, sometimes under the alleged codename “Snow Bunny” . One report says the claim originated from an X post about an internal test version, and that the model could generate 3,000 lines of code from a single prompt . Another blog repeats similar “Snow Bunny” claims and describes them as leaked benchmark data rather than official Google results .
Second, some coverage points to alleged Google AI Studio A/B tests or hidden checkpoints. Geeky Gadgets describes leaked AI Studio testing under the working title “Gemini Advance,” with claimed gains in instruction-following and creative tasks but also inconsistencies in visual outputs and other areas . YouTube summaries are even less consistent: one says the alleged Gemini 3.5 test performed worse than Gemini 3.0 Pro, while another claims a 40% boost in coding and reasoning .
That inconsistency is the key issue. One YouTube snippet explicitly warns that anonymous benchmark screenshots and forum claims were not verified or reproducible . In other words, the leaks may be real signals of experimentation, but the available sources do not prove a released model, a stable benchmark, or a launch date.
There is no evidence-backed date. Some rumor posts floated early-2026 timing, including February or March expectations . But the official Google listing cited here still shows Gemini 3.1 preview models and no Gemini 3.5 entry .
The only quantified timing signal in the available sources is a Manifold prediction market. It showed 34% odds for release before June 2026, 44% before July, 60% before August, and 67% before September . That points to a speculative mid-2026 expectation among bettors, not a Google roadmap.
The market’s own rules are a useful reality check: it counts a release only if the model is accessible without individual vetting or invitation, and it excludes closed betas, invite-only access, researcher programs, A/B tests, and anonymous benchmark appearances . By that standard, the current leak claims would not count as a public Gemini 3.5 launch.
A credible public release should appear in an official Google channel, such as Gemini API documentation or a Google product announcement. In the available official documentation, Gemini 3.1 preview models are listed and Gemini 3.5 is not .
Until that changes, treat these as weak evidence rather than confirmation:
Those signals can be useful to monitor, but they are not the same as a release note, model card, API listing, or public product rollout.
Gemini 3.5 is not confirmed as a publicly released model, and there is no official release date in the available Google documentation . A summer 2026 window is a reasonable way to describe current speculation because prediction-market expectations cluster around June through August, but it should be labeled speculation unless Google publishes an official Gemini 3.5 listing or announcement .