The central claim is supported as a report, not as a confirmed dismissal: Bloomberg says The Wall Street Journal reported on November 11, 2026, that Nvidia’s board was preparing to oust Jensen Huang over multiple extramarital affairs, including one involving a suspected Chinese intelligence asset. 10 However, the evidence available here does not verify every detail in your account, and one source contradicts the claimed subsequent share-price rise. 9

• Board action versus company position: AP reported that Nvidia opened an investigation on November 8 and said Huang would remain CEO during it. 8 The November 11 report therefore signals a possible change in direction, but I don’t know whether a same-day board meeting occurred or whether removal was formally approved.

• Relationship and espionage allegations: Reporting supports Huang’s acknowledgment of an affair with Megaspeed executive Alice Huang. 15 The allegation that she worked for Chinese intelligence must remain attributed to reporting and intelligence assessments—not presented as a publicly adjudicated fact. Bloomberg’s account describes her as a suspected spy. 10 Insufficient evidence here to verify exactly two relationships, his complete employee apology, or his October characterization of their interactions.

• Independent investigation: Bloomberg reported that Nvidia’s independent directors retained Wachtell Lipton’s Joon Kim, a former senior federal prosecutor, to investigate Huang’s relationship. 6

• Congressional scrutiny: An official House Foreign Affairs Committee release confirms that chairmen Brian Mast, John Moolenaar and Rick Crawford requested a joint, closed-door briefing from Huang. 1 Insufficient evidence in the retrieved official excerpt to confirm the November 18 date, its precise relationship to earnings, or Senator Chris Coons’s promised investigation.

• Market reaction: The Economist reports that Nvidia shares fell in after-hours trading following the Journal’s ouster report, rather than rose. 9 These could describe different trading windows, but without timestamped prices I cannot reconcile them or verify the exact $450 billion two-day loss.

• Ownership and control: Reuters puts Huang’s stake at roughly 3.6%, close to your 3.5% figure, and reports that he lacks special founder voting shares. 5 That evidence does not itself establish the precise Delaware-law procedures for removing him as CEO versus director; those require the applicable statute and Nvidia’s governing documents.

• Succession and analyst expectations: Reporting discusses the possibility of Nvidia operating without Huang, but that is not confirmation of a selected successor. 3 A November 11 report quotes Dan Ives estimating that removing Huang could reduce Nvidia’s value by 25%–30%; that is a valuation forecast, not the claimed 15% probability of removal. 13 Insufficient evidence here to verify all four proposed successors, Rasgon’s exact remarks, or the latest “without interruption” statement.

The San Jose class-action allegations, the purported $7.5 billion sales connection, FBI scrutiny and China’s specific denial also need fuller source verification before this can be treated as a complete, publication-ready account.

The central claim is supported as a report, not as a confirmed dismissal: Bloomberg says The Wall Street Journal reported on November 11, 2026, that Nvidia’s board was preparing to oust Jensen Huang over multiple extramarital affairs, including one involving a suspected Chinese intelligence asset. 10 However, the evidence available here does not verify every detail in your account, and one source contradicts the claimed subsequent share-price rise. 9

• Board action versus company position: AP reported that Nvidia opened an investigation on November 8 and said Huang would remain CEO during it. 8 The November 11 report therefore signals a possible change in direction, but I don’t know whether a same-day board meeting occurred or whether removal was formally approved.

• Relationship and espionage allegations: Reporting supports Huang’s acknowledgment of an affair with Megaspeed executive Alice Huang. 15 The allegation that she worked for Chinese intelligence must remain attributed to reporting and intelligence assessments—not presented as a publicly adjudicated fact. Bloomberg’s account describes her as a suspected spy. 10 Insufficient evidence here to verify exactly two relationships, his complete employee apology, or his October characterization of their interactions.

• Independent investigation: Bloomberg reported that Nvidia’s independent directors retained Wachtell Lipton’s Joon Kim, a former senior federal prosecutor, to investigate Huang’s relationship. 6

• Congressional scrutiny: An official House Foreign Affairs Committee release confirms that chairmen Brian Mast, John Moolenaar and Rick Crawford requested a joint, closed-door briefing from Huang. 1 Insufficient evidence in the retrieved official excerpt to confirm the November 18 date, its precise relationship to earnings, or Senator Chris Coons’s promised investigation.

• Market reaction: The Economist reports that Nvidia shares fell in after-hours trading following the Journal’s ouster report, rather than rose. 9 These could describe different trading windows, but without timestamped prices I cannot reconcile them or verify the exact $450 billion two-day loss.

• Ownership and control: Reuters puts Huang’s stake at roughly 3.6%, close to your 3.5% figure, and reports that he lacks special founder voting shares. 5 That evidence does not itself establish the precise Delaware-law procedures for removing him as CEO versus director; those require the applicable statute and Nvidia’s governing documents.

• Succession and analyst expectations: Reporting discusses the possibility of Nvidia operating without Huang, but that is not confirmation of a selected successor. 3 A November 11 report quotes Dan Ives estimating that removing Huang could reduce Nvidia’s value by 25%–30%; that is a valuation forecast, not the claimed 15% probability of removal. 13 Insufficient evidence here to verify all four proposed successors, Rasgon’s exact remarks, or the latest “without interruption” statement.

The San Jose class-action allegations, the purported $7.5 billion sales connection, FBI scrutiny and China’s specific denial also need fuller source verification before this can be treated as a complete, publication-ready account.