AnswersPublished18 sources
A 13-Year-Dormant Bitcoin Address Moved $33.4M—But Was It Sold?
On Oct. 18, 2026, the 13Coop address sent 411.45 BTC—reported at about $33.44 million—to a new address. Reports put the transaction fee at 337 satoshis.
Published byEdited with GPT-6 LunaImages generated with GPT Image 2
Research answer
Key takeaways
- On Oct. 18, 2026, the 13Coop address sent 411.45 BTC—reported at about $33.44 million—to a new address.
- Reports put the transaction fee at 337 satoshis. A rough 2013 price comparison puts the coins’ value near $53,900 then, but that is not a verified purchase cost or realized profit.[43][48][1]
- The address was reported as “Noah Doe 970,” one of 39,069 wallets at issue in an abandonment dispute.
AI Prompt
openai.comCreate a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: What is known about the “13Coop” Bitcoin wallet’s transfer of its entire 411.45 BTC balance, worth approximately $33.4 million–$34 million,. Article summary: The reported transfer was a first-ever outgoing spend from `13Coop8xFbYj9JR9WyF5EqzGa9GiZmxs7C`: 411.45 BTC, valued by Galaxy Research at $33.44 million, after approximately 13.1 years without spending.[56] The available. Topic tags: general, general web, user generated, government. Style: premium digital editorial illustration, source-backed research mood, clean composition, high detail, modern web publication hero. Use reference image context only for broad subject, composition, and topical grounding; do not copy the exact image. Avoid: logos, brand marks, copyrighted characters, real person likenesses, fake screenshots, UI text, readable text, watermarks, cha
A Bitcoin address beginning 13Coop sent 411.45 BTC—valued in contemporaneous reports at about $33.4 million—on Oct. 18, 2026. It was the address’s first reported outgoing transaction since 2013. The coins went to a new, unlabeled address; the available reporting does not show that they were sold.2
6
What happened to the 411.45 BTC?
The transaction was recorded at 18:23 UTC (2:23 p.m. ET) in block 972,036. Galaxy Research identified two spent outputs totaling 411.45 BTC from 13Coop8xFbYj9JR9WyF5EqzGa9GiZmxs7C.2
16
Reports describe the destination as a single new address with no known label. Some coverage identifies it as SegWit, but the available information does not establish its exact address type or provide enough detail to independently verify that it was specifically a P2WPKH address.5
6
16
Several reports give the fee as 337 satoshis. That is the reported network fee for the transaction, not a percentage of the BTC transferred.
What was the bitcoin worth in 2013?
Reports say most of the balance arrived on Sept. 11, 2013, when Bitcoin was trading near $131.1
13 Applying that price to all 411.45 BTC gives a rough historical value of about $53,900. It is a price-based estimate, not proof of what the holder paid or when each coin was acquired.
At the reported transfer-time valuation of about $33.44 million, the difference from that rough historical estimate is about $33.39 million. That comparison describes price appreciation on paper; the transaction alone does not establish a sale or a realized profit. Galaxy Research’s attribution separately lists an estimated average basis of about $127, but an on-chain estimate is not a verified record of the owner’s actual purchase cost.2
16
Does the transfer mean the owner sold?
Not on the evidence reported so far. The coins moved to a new, unlabeled address, and coverage reported no outgoing transaction from the recipient when it was checked.6
7 That is evidence about the observed on-chain path at that time—not proof that the coins were never later sent to an exchange or sold privately.
A move to a fresh SegWit address is consistent with a wallet migration or upgrade, but it does not reveal the holder’s motive. The transaction record cannot distinguish a wallet-management change from other possibilities, including a sale arranged outside an exchange.5
6
Tiny deposits and address-poisoning reports
One report says several small deposits associated with the address were flagged as possible address-poisoning attempts. In this scam pattern, a tiny transfer can put a lookalike address into a wallet’s transaction history, where someone might mistakenly copy it later. The available reporting does not establish that the deposits caused this transfer, that the holder interacted with them, or exactly how many there were.
Why the move matters to the ownership dispute
Coverage identifies the address as “Noah Doe #970” and links it to a reported dispute over 39,069 dormant addresses that a pseudonymous plaintiff and two Wyoming companies allege were abandoned. Reports put the combined holdings at roughly 3.8 million BTC.5
3
The address’s ability to spend the coins shows that someone had access to the necessary spending control. It does not, by itself, identify that person as the legal owner or decide whether any address in the dispute was abandoned. Those are separate questions from whether a transaction occurred.
Does this show dormant Bitcoin is moving faster?
There was other reported activity nearby in time: two addresses funded in 2013 moved a combined 416.69 BTC on Oct. 17, according to one report. That puts the 13Coop transfer in a short run of attention-grabbing movements from older addresses, but a handful of reported transactions is not enough to establish that dormant-coin activity is accelerating overall.
The clearest conclusion is narrower: 411.45 BTC left a long-dormant address and reached a new one. The transaction’s timing, fee and value have been reported, but the owner’s identity, motive and any subsequent sale remain unconfirmed.2
6
Studio Global AI
Continue your research
This page includes a source-backed answer you can continue inside Studio Global.
People also ask
What is the short answer to "A 13-Year-Dormant Bitcoin Address Moved $33.4M—But Was It Sold?"?
On Oct. 18, 2026, the 13Coop address sent 411.45 BTC—reported at about $33.44 million—to a new address.
What are the key points to validate first?
On Oct. 18, 2026, the 13Coop address sent 411.45 BTC—reported at about $33.44 million—to a new address. Reports put the transaction fee at 337 satoshis. A rough 2013 price comparison puts the coins’ value near $53,900 then, but that is not a verified purchase cost or realized profit.[43][48][1]
What should I do next in practice?
The address was reported as “Noah Doe 970,” one of 39,069 wallets at issue in an abandonment dispute.