As of September 17, 2026, suppliers were shifting MLCC production toward higher value AI applications, tightening mainstream supply. Samsung’s largest disclosed AI server MLCC agreement was worth 1.0722 trillion won for deliveries throughout 2027; Murata’s phased withdrawals did not guarantee Samsung immediate repla...
Published byEdited with GPT-6 SolImages generated with GPT Image 2
Research answer

Create a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: How is the AI boom reshaping the multilayer ceramic capacitor (MLCC) market and strengthening Samsung Electro-Mechanics’ pricing power as of. Article summary: As of September 17, 2026, the AI boom was shifting MLCC production toward premium server components, tightening mainstream supply and strengthening Samsung Electro-Mechanics’ pricing power despite weak traditional-electr. Topic tags: general, news, general web, user generated. Style: premium digital editorial illustration, source-backed research mood, clean composition, high detail, modern web publication hero. Use reference image context only for broad subject, composition, and topical grounding; do not copy the exact image. Avoid: logos, brand marks, copyrighted characters, real person likenesses, fake screenshots, UI text, readable text, watermarks, charts w
The AI infrastructure boom is changing which multilayer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs) manufacturers prioritize. These components are used across electronic devices, including AI servers, but suppliers are directing more production toward higher-value server applications. That shift can tighten availability of mainstream parts even when demand from smartphones, PCs and other traditional electronics is weak.3
10
TrendForce says Japanese and Korean manufacturers have been reallocating production from consumer-grade X5R MLCCs toward higher-end X6S and X7R components used in AI applications.3 The logic resembles the prioritization of high-bandwidth memory: when AI products command production resources, less capacity is available for conventional products. It is a shift in supply mix, not evidence of a broad consumer-electronics rebound.
3
10
Order books show the pressure. By late June 2026, TrendForce reported book-to-bill ratios of 1.30 for Murata, 1.31 for Samsung Electro-Mechanics and 1.25 for Taiyo Yuden. A ratio above 1 means new orders are running ahead of billings; it does not mean the same percentage of capacity is unavailable.12
Murata has notified customers of plans to discontinue selected part numbers across nine MLCC series, affecting general-purpose consumer and industrial products as well as some automotive parts. It is not withdrawing every part in those series. Reports put the final-order deadline in March 2028 and final shipments in March 2029, making this a gradual transition rather than an immediate supply cutoff.8
10
Murata’s reported portfolio review should also be distinguished from the industry’s interpretation that AI demand is driving capacity decisions. The available evidence does not establish that AI was Murata’s explicitly stated reason for every discontinuation.8
10 Because customers have time to qualify alternatives—and Samsung is also prioritizing higher-end products—Murata’s move should not be treated as an immediate, measurable windfall of replacement orders for Samsung.
3
8
TrendForce projected average fourth-quarter 2026 increases of 25–30% for mainstream X5R products supplied to OEM and ODM customers and 10–20% for higher-end X6S products used in AI servers. Those are estimates, not proof that every buyer will pay the quoted increase; final prices depend on negotiations.2
Forward contracts provide another signal. Samsung disclosed three MLCC supply agreements in 2026 worth a combined 1.8213 trillion won, with deliveries beginning in 2027.2 The largest, announced September 1, is a 1.0722 trillion won agreement to supply an undisclosed global technology customer with AI-server MLCCs throughout 2027. TrendForce identifies it as Samsung’s largest single MLCC long-term supply agreement.
6 The agreements show customers securing future supply, though the disclosed contracts alone do not establish how widely the market has moved from buying as needed to annual commitments.
2
6
The near-term case for stronger Samsung pricing is therefore tighter supply across product grades, orders outpacing billings and substantial forward commitments—not an assumption that Murata’s customers will switch suppliers at once. Whether the projected price increases hold will become clearer as fourth-quarter customer negotiations conclude.2
3
12
Studio Global AI
This page includes a source-backed answer you can continue inside Studio Global.
As of September 17, 2026, suppliers were shifting MLCC production toward higher value AI applications, tightening mainstream supply.
As of September 17, 2026, suppliers were shifting MLCC production toward higher value AI applications, tightening mainstream supply. Samsung’s largest disclosed AI server MLCC agreement was worth 1.0722 trillion won for deliveries throughout 2027; Murata’s phased withdrawals did not guarantee Samsung immediate replacement orders.[2][6][10]