AnswersPublished12 sources
What does a Capgemini survey of 1,300 executives from large organizations and public bodies across 11 countries reveal about their growing exposure to digital sovereignty risks from geopolitical tensions, export controls, cyberattacks, and disruptions to data center and telecommu
The survey indicates that dependence on cloud, data centre, telecoms, and other critical digital providers is now viewed as a concrete operational resilience risk—not merely an IT concern. Geopolitical tension, export controls, cyberattacks, and attacks or disruption affecting data centre and telecommunications infr...
Published byImages generated with GPT Image 2
Research answer
Key takeaways
- The survey indicates that dependence on cloud, data centre, telecoms, and other critical digital providers is now viewed as a concrete operational resilience risk—not merely an IT concern.
- Geopolitical tension, export controls, cyberattacks, and attacks or disruption affecting data centre and telecommunications infrastructure have made the potential loss of a provider materially more salient.
- [1] What boards are doing Boards are treating digital infrastructure more like energy and physical supply chains because its failure can interrupt core operations and may not be quickly reversible.
- That is driving greater board oversight, contingency planning, risk mapping, and investment in resilience.
AI Prompt
openai.comCreate a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: What does a Capgemini survey of 1,300 executives from large organizations and public bodies across 11 countries reveal about their growing e. Article summary: The survey indicates that dependence on cloud, data centre, telecoms, and other critical digital providers is now viewed as a concrete operational resilience risk—not merely an IT concern.. Topic tags: general web, ai, workflow, security, regulation. Style: premium digital editorial illustration, source-backed research mood, clean composition, high detail, modern web publication hero. Use reference image context only for broad subject, composition, and topical grounding; do not copy the exact image. Avoid: logos, brand marks, copyrighted characters, real person likenesses, fake screenshots, UI text, readable text, watermarks, charts with fake numbers, clickbait
The survey indicates that dependence on cloud, data-centre, telecoms, and other critical digital providers is now viewed as a concrete operational-resilience risk—not merely an IT concern. Geopolitical tension, export controls, cyberattacks, and attacks or disruption affecting data-centre and telecommunications infrastructure have made the potential loss of a provider materially more salient. 1
What boards are doing
- Boards are treating digital infrastructure more like energy and physical supply chains because its failure can interrupt core operations and may not be quickly reversible. That is driving greater board oversight, contingency planning, risk mapping, and investment in resilience.
1
- The objective is not necessarily to replace every foreign or large technology provider. It is to avoid being locked in: retain credible alternatives, portable architectures, and practical exit plans.
Exposure and budgets
- The supplied evidence does not state the percentage of organizations reporting “significant exposure,” nor the percentage that have set aside a dedicated sovereignty budget. Insufficient evidence to give those figures reliably.
Airbus and reducing dependency
- Airbus is an example of a company reducing concentration risk by using alternative infrastructure for sensitive work: it signed a multi-year agreement with Scaleway for cloud infrastructure supporting sensitive industrial and defence applications and AI tools.
- More broadly, this approach means diversifying providers and ensuring critical technologies or workloads can be moved if a supplier becomes unavailable, restricted, or compromised.
Meaning of digital sovereignty
- In this context, digital sovereignty means “substitutability”: an organization’s capacity to replace a critical technology or provider when necessary. It is not inherently a nationalist policy or an opposition between countries.
- The practical test is whether the organization can switch providers while preserving business continuity, legal control, security, and access to essential assets.
Assets organizations want to control
Executives are particularly concerned with retaining control over:
- Proprietary and sensitive data;
- AI models;
- Intellectual property; and
- Other critical workloads whose loss of access, migration, or reconstruction would be difficult.
How long a replacement could take
Studio Global AI
Continue your research
This page includes a source-backed answer you can continue inside Studio Global.
People also ask
What is the short answer to "What does a Capgemini survey of 1,300 executives from large organizations and public bodies across 11 countries reveal about their growing exposure to digital sovereignty risks from geopolitical tensions, export controls, cyberattacks, and disruptions to data center and telecommu"?
The survey indicates that dependence on cloud, data centre, telecoms, and other critical digital providers is now viewed as a concrete operational resilience risk—not merely an IT concern.
What are the key points to validate first?
The survey indicates that dependence on cloud, data centre, telecoms, and other critical digital providers is now viewed as a concrete operational resilience risk—not merely an IT concern. Geopolitical tension, export controls, cyberattacks, and attacks or disruption affecting data centre and telecommunications infrastructure have made the potential loss of a provider materially more salient.
What should I do next in practice?
[1] What boards are doing Boards are treating digital infrastructure more like energy and physical supply chains because its failure can interrupt core operations and may not be quickly reversible.