Key settlement amounts

• RWE – $1.22 billion for three leases off New York, California, and Louisiana
• TotalEnergies – roughly $1 billion for two leases off North Carolina and elsewhere
• Invenergy – $765 million for four leases off New York, California, and Maine
• Duke Energy – $129 million for a lease in the Carolina Long Bay area

The policy framework began with President Trump's January 20, 2025 memorandum withdrawing the entire U.S. Outer Continental Shelf from new offshore wind leasing and ordering a review of existing permits .

How RWE is spending its $1.22 billion

RWE is redirecting the settlement funds entirely into natural gas and LNG projects, effectively replacing planned offshore wind farms with fossil fuel infrastructure .

The $1.22 billion covers RWE's original lease acquisition costs and sunk development expenses . The company had paid $1.1 billion for its U.S. offshore wind leases .

Replaced investments:

• $900 million to acquire a 16% stake in a Louisiana LNG export terminal project
• Additional investment in U.S. natural gas-fired power plants
• Overall, RWE plans to invest approximately €17 billion (~$19.6 billion) in the U.S. over six years to grow its generation capacity, primarily in gas

The three cancelled leases were in the New York Bight, offshore California, and offshore Louisiana . RWE said "there is no path forward to permit these projects in the US for the foreseeable future" .

Environmental impact

The environmental effect involves a direct substitution of renewable energy with fossil fuel infrastructure:

• Foregone clean energy: The three RWE leases would have built large-scale offshore wind farms capable of powering hundreds of thousands of homes with zero-carbon electricity
• New fossil fuel emissions: The $900 million Louisiana LNG stake will support construction of an export terminal, enabling increased natural gas production and combustion
• Cumulative effect: Across all roughly $4 billion in settlements, the administration has redirected billions from offshore wind into oil, gas, and LNG investments, locking in additional fossil fuel infrastructure that would operate for decades
• Policy context: The January 2025 memorandum halted new wind leasing and paused approvals, creating the regulatory pressure that led leaseholders to accept buyouts

Critics have noted the apparent contradiction of the U.S. paying billions of taxpayer dollars — described by the government as reimbursements for lease costs — to cancel clean energy projects while simultaneously redirecting investment toward fossil fuels that will increase greenhouse gas emissions .

Key settlement amounts

• RWE – $1.22 billion for three leases off New York, California, and Louisiana
• TotalEnergies – roughly $1 billion for two leases off North Carolina and elsewhere
• Invenergy – $765 million for four leases off New York, California, and Maine
• Duke Energy – $129 million for a lease in the Carolina Long Bay area

The policy framework began with President Trump's January 20, 2025 memorandum withdrawing the entire U.S. Outer Continental Shelf from new offshore wind leasing and ordering a review of existing permits .

How RWE is spending its $1.22 billion

RWE is redirecting the settlement funds entirely into natural gas and LNG projects, effectively replacing planned offshore wind farms with fossil fuel infrastructure .

The $1.22 billion covers RWE's original lease acquisition costs and sunk development expenses . The company had paid $1.1 billion for its U.S. offshore wind leases .

Replaced investments:

• $900 million to acquire a 16% stake in a Louisiana LNG export terminal project
• Additional investment in U.S. natural gas-fired power plants
• Overall, RWE plans to invest approximately €17 billion (~$19.6 billion) in the U.S. over six years to grow its generation capacity, primarily in gas

The three cancelled leases were in the New York Bight, offshore California, and offshore Louisiana . RWE said "there is no path forward to permit these projects in the US for the foreseeable future" .

Environmental impact

The environmental effect involves a direct substitution of renewable energy with fossil fuel infrastructure:

• Foregone clean energy: The three RWE leases would have built large-scale offshore wind farms capable of powering hundreds of thousands of homes with zero-carbon electricity
• New fossil fuel emissions: The $900 million Louisiana LNG stake will support construction of an export terminal, enabling increased natural gas production and combustion
• Cumulative effect: Across all roughly $4 billion in settlements, the administration has redirected billions from offshore wind into oil, gas, and LNG investments, locking in additional fossil fuel infrastructure that would operate for decades
• Policy context: The January 2025 memorandum halted new wind leasing and paused approvals, creating the regulatory pressure that led leaseholders to accept buyouts

Critics have noted the apparent contradiction of the U.S. paying billions of taxpayer dollars — described by the government as reimbursements for lease costs — to cancel clean energy projects while simultaneously redirecting investment toward fossil fuels that will increase greenhouse gas emissions .